Romans
15:4-13 * Luke 21:25-33
Taking
a cue from the opening of today’s Epistle, and the last line from today’s
Gospel, and of course the Collect, this Sunday has come to be called Bible
Sunday. The
Collect speaks of two things, one being the obligation of each one of us
concerning the Holy Scriptures to “hear them, read, mark, learn, and inwardly
digest them;” the other being the work of the Holy Spirit as he uses those
scriptures to grow within us patience and comfort that keeps us along the path
to eternal life in Jesus Christ our Lord. And, if we think about the Epistle
and Gospel for this day, we find that hope to be what our Prayer Book calls
“the sure and certain hope of the resurrection unto eternal life.”
Recently,
someone questioned me on why we refer to hope of the resurrection; after
all, we hope for things that may never happen. I must disagree; we may wish for
things that will never happen; but, hope cannot exist in such wishes. Or we may
hope for things that might happen, but might not. But, to emphasize the
meaning of hope as it relates to faith, we clarify our meaning with the words
“sure and certain.” This comes from the Epistle to the Hebrews:
"Wherein
God, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability
of his counsel, confirmed it by an oath: That by two immutable things, in which
it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have
fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us: Which hope we have as
an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which entereth into that
within the veil (Hebrews 6: 17-19).”
It
is clear that St. Paul
never separated hope from faith, and never separated these from charity. These
virtues grow together, and hope depends on faith. Hope believes, and love
works; faith hopes and charity labors. What feeds us in our sure and certain
hope is the word of God. Faith grows within us when we hear that particular
voice, the voice of God that we discern so clearly as he speaks to us now within
the scriptures. They cannot become irrelevant. Written so long ago, when they
are spoken or read God himself speaks in the present. Never are they worn out.
People
have asked about the Holy Scriptures, when were they put together? One very
unfortunate mark of our times is the quickness with which misinformation
becomes “common knowledge.” Over the last few years some con artists have
discovered that one way to make a lot of money in a hurry is to write a
sensational, wholly misleading but shocking thesis about the Bible or Christian
Faith in general, and then sell it directly to the public. The more
revolutionary it is, the better. The more shocking, the more blasphemous, above
all the more sensational, the easier it is to draw attention to it, and get it
promoted on TV. We have seen these sensational works, all claiming to be a
challenge to the Christian Faith, each make its rise and fall before burning
out entirely. One very important point about that whole new industry is that
none of those authors presents the shocking alleged discovery in the truly
scientific arena of the academic world. If they did, they could not make the
same amount of money overnight- or ever. If their shocking “discoveries” were
put through the genuine process of scientific analysis they would die a quick
death and be forgotten, and no one would get to make a killing. This con art
was perfected by Elaine Pagels, herself someone taken seriously by the public,
but never in the real world of professional academics, where her name is not
respected at all. But, if she cries about the bad reputation she has in the
academic world, she does so all the way to the bank.
As
a result of the sensational, irresponsible and unprofessional, thoroughly
unscientific misinformation that has been thrown in the face of the public for
the last few years, several people think that the bishops of the Church
assembled in Nicea and began cutting books out of the Bible. Most of the people
who believe this also think the Emperor Constantine was running the Council of
Nicea in 325.
A
few facts help to clean up this misinformation. Even though he was the Emperor,
and even though the Christians of that time knew that the Edict of Milan in 313
AD had ended two and a half centuries of persecution (a virtual holocaust during
the earliest centuries of the Church), and even though they knew that he had
the authority to return to the older laws that had made Christianity an offense
punishable by death and revive them, he was not given the power to run the
Council of Nicea. When the Council met and the Emperor presumed to address the
bishops of the Church, they told him that he was not allowed to address the
assembled bishops of Christ’s Church. Basically, they told
Caesar, the Emperor Constantine to whom they owed so much, to sit down and shut
up.
Now,
about the Bible, the bishops at the Council of Nicea did not go about deciding
which books were scripture, and which were not. All they did was to affirm in
unity of mind that the books already perceived to be the Word of God were,
indeed, just that. The Old Testament was not the issue at all, because it was
declared to be the Word of God by no less a Person than the Living Word of God.
These books had been received by the Jewish people for centuries, and were
passed on to the Church with sure and certain authority. The process of
recognizing these books was, by all accounts, the vox populi of the
Jews. The Jewish people knew in what books to find that distinctive voice of
God, and so it was that when Jesus Christ walked the earth and referred to the
scriptures, in every synagogue of the Jews were those specific scrolls that
formed the common library for all of them. We see in Luke that he read from the
scroll of the prophets, reading from Isaiah and saying that scriptures spoke of
none other but himself, Messiah and hope of the world.
In
the earliest days of the Church this Old Testament formed the only Canon of
scripture. But, by the early years of the second century we find that
twenty-seven additional books were already received and quoted as the word of
God; these twenty seven books forming an additional canon of scripture. These
books are the New Testament. In some places a few questions were raised about
II Peter, Jude and Revelation. But, over time they were received. In a few
places some people thought that The Shepherd of Hermas might be part of
the Canon of the scriptures of the Church. But, long before the Council of
Nicea in 325, the Church had defined its Canon as the books we have now, adding
to the Jewish scriptures it had inherited only the twenty-seven books we call
the New Testament. Again, as it had been among Israel ,
when the scriptures were received and recognized vox populi, so it was
with the Church
of Christ and the canon
of the New Testament. There were no books for the bishops to delete, but rather
a Canon already established before any of them had been born.
Now,
why was The Shepherd of Hermas not among the books of this Canon? Again,
by that same vox populi that, by the principle of whether or not the
people of God recognized the voice of God, this book had not been under serious
consideration. Simply put, our fathers among the Jews and the early Christians
simply did not hear the clear and familiar voice of God in any other
books as they heard it in the scriptures. They knew the voice of God in the
Law, the Prophets, the Wisdom Literature and the Psalms. And, they knew that
same voice of God in the four Gospels, the Epistles and the prophecy of St. John the Revelator.
They did not hear it as the voice of God in other books (not that most of them
were ever aware of the many Gnostic writings given so much undue attention by
today’s money making sensation mongers).
They
were a people so purified that among them was found one young virgin who echoed
the faith and obedience of Abraham, and more perfectly than the ancient
patriarch himself. Written "afore time" was not only this history of
the people through whom the Word, Jesus our Lord, would be incarnate, but the
predictions made by the prophets of his life, his death on the cross, and his
rising again. We all need to read Isaiah about the Suffering Servant by whose
stripes we are healed, and who prolonged his days after dying, that he would
live forever as the agent of the Lord’s will. We read of his suffering through
the words of King David who foresaw the agonies of the Lord’s crucifixion, able
to predict them in the first person as though suffering with him. We read also,
in the words of this prophet king, of the joy of the resurrection of our Lord
whose death was so brief a thing that he never saw corruption.
The
Gospel today also gives us this hope, for the Lord himself assures us that his
coming again will be our redemption, and that the fears and darkness of this
age will disappear in the light of his glory. We are told to lift up our heads,
not to look down and hang our heads. His coming to rule over heaven and earth,
cleansing this world from all evil, from death and suffering, and all such
things that will be no more, is sure and certain. And, if instead of comfort
this fills your heart with fear, then consider that fear with genuine care. It
means that you must cast off the works of darkness and out on the armor of
light, repent from all your sins and turn to the Lord that you may enter that
blessed state of sure and certain hope, and be strengthened by the Holy Spirit.
Does
the voice of God fill you with hope or with dread? I hope it does one or the
other. For, anyone to be indifferent to these words is the only real danger. As
our Lord said in his parable of Lazarus and the rich man, “If they hear not
Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from
the dead.”1 Our Lord told the Church of the Laodiceans, “I know thy works, that
thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because
thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.”2
Indifference to the word of God is a danger beyond any other, closing the ears
that they cannot hear. But, even if the word brings dread, this too leads to
comfort and hope since the Holy Spirit uses what you hear to bring you to
repentance, true repentance from the heart, and to faith in Jesus Christ. May
God grant ears to hear, eyes to see and a heart to understand, that each one
who is lost may turn and be healed. 3
The
Epistle today speaks of Christ’s ministry first to his own people of Israel , and his ministry through those people of
Israel
that believed in him and became his disciples as it extends to all nations.
“Now
I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision for the truth of
God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers: and that the Gentiles might
glorify God for his mercy; as it is written, For this cause I will confess to
thee among the Gentiles, and sing unto thy name. And again he saith, Rejoice,
ye Gentiles, with his people. And again, Praise the Lord, all ye Gentiles; and
laud him, all ye people. And again, Esaias saith, There shall be a root of
Jesse, and he that shall rise to reign over the Gentiles; In him shall the
Gentiles trust.”
This brings to mind the
words of Simeon, that he spoke when he held Jesus as an infant: “A light to
lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel .” 4
This light and this glory has been known to the world because it is the purpose
of God to shine the light of Christ into every dark place. Into the darkness of
pagan dread and superstition, into the darkness of ignorance and foolishness,
into the darkest places of sin and death. This glorious light of Christ shines
into the darkest places where we try to hide from God due to our own sins; and
if we respond to his mercy that same light of revelation brings comfort and
hope, the sure and certain hope of the resurrection unto eternal life. The
invitation is extended by his word: come, eat and be filled with the food and
drink of eternal life. Come feed on the Living Bread that has come down from
heaven, and with hearty repentance and true faith receive Christ through these
humble means unto everlasting life with him in glory.
“Now the God of hope fill you with all joy and
peace in believing, that ye may abound in hope, through the power of the Holy
Ghost.”
2. Revelation 3:15, 16
3. From Isaiah 6:9
5 comments:
Hello Father Haart and Others,
I am a believer who attends a rather liberal mainline denominational church in lower Michigan. I am reading your blog this Advent and appreciate and need your stance on repentance, and the like. My questions are these:
(1) In our service, The Magnificat was the theme on which everything was based liturgically and otherwise, not Bible Sunday. Also, God loving us and being with us whereever we are on the journey is a certainty. Nothing about choosing to follow Him.
(2) Is this becoming common for most churches to assume a position of tolerance and love, especially those who adhere to the Sacraments?
(3) Does God place people in these liberal-minded churches for reasons known to Him, or do we fall prey to Babylon by choosing to stay in such circles?
Thank you for your blogs and for telling the old old story.
Blessings in our Messiah,
David Russell (Mellow Roc)
Dear Father Haart and Others,
I hope my recent comment did not remain or does not interfere whith what I post below, questions for direction.
(1) Churches that approach Advent from a positive aspect of Christ coming, are they doing a disservice not to acclaim both positive and the serious side of His coming?
(2) One cannot control what the priest/pastor espouses from the pulpit week to week, are we to co-exist with those who emphasize a Gospel of love over one of choice and accountability?
(3) Are mainline seminaries discouraging proclamation such as yours from those they train currently?
I am following your blog this Advent, and sure appreciate the return to orthodoxy if you will. Thank you!
In Messiah,
David
The phrase "a Gospel of love" as meaning what? acceptance of sin rather than preaching repentance for the forgiveness of sin? I take that as your meaning, and therefore take the liberty of renaming it, I hope without presumption. The Gospel is the manifest and true historical story of the love of God (Romans 5:8. John 3:16). That love is shown most clearly on the cross. It opens us all to God's forgiveness. But His forgiveness requires both repentance and faith according to what the Prophets and Apostles, and indeed the Lord Himself, all preached and taught. If your church is preaching another gospel, than I suggest you think seriously about departing from it to one in which you can bring others in good conscience. How, otherwise, can you be a faithful witness, as Andrew was to Peter? And there is the need for your own soul as well to be fed, and exhorted.
Hello Father Haart and others,
I hope you will dialogue with me a bit more on this topic. Here is how I understand the Gospel being presented.
God loves all humans to death. We are invited to share in that same pattern of life.
Through your baptism and taking communion you put on Christ.
You then can go out and spread the love of God by feeding the poor, sending a letter to someone, caring about another.
Nothing about repentance other than to change your mind about sin. This too supposes we can do nothing to affect our salvation but to believe and God will love us no matter what. Subtly it seems to give license for sinful indulgence since God can only save one.
This seems to have enough of the familiar to make it not feel so different. But when reading writers like you, it does seem quite different.
Does that clarify what's occurring in our congregation?
I hear much more credit given to the Sacraments than in times past.
God bless you and thank you.
David
Metanoia (translated "Repent") literally means to change your mind. But the usage adds also the clear meaning of acting on that change of mind. One must stop and turn around, ceasing to sin and beginning to do right. As demonstrated by Zacheus, repentance means restoring and making right, when possible, anyone whom we have wronged.
Post a Comment