Monday, January 05, 2009

The Epiphany

Icon by Monastery Icons

Isaiah 60:1-9
Eph 3:1-12
Matt. 2: 1-12

The most radical line to be uttered in the ancient world must have been the first of the Ten Commandments. “Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.” It was completely out of the ordinary in the days when the peoples of the earth were expected to worship the local deities; in fact, for Israel to believe that their God was the only true God, and all others were vain, was as out of place amid the pagans of antiquity as a fervent expression of Nationalism would be out of place on the floor of the United Nations. To what degree any of the ancient pagans may have thought themselves to be refined and sensitive, the Israelites must have come across as ill mannered. And, since the Law and the prophets of Israel denounced the practices of some of the religions, such as child sacrifice, it was very clear that the Jews simply were not willing to change with the times, and that they were intolerant.

Furthermore, not only was the God of Israel considered to be the one and only true God to His own people, but the only true God at all. The phrase that is translated “before Me” is quite significant. The Hebrew expression is al peni, and it means “in front of my face.” That might not be so bad for a local god that stayed within his boundaries; but this God had been in Chaldea with Abraham, called him into Canaan, went with the family of Israel into Egypt, and took them back to Canaan. Everywhere He went He was the ruler, showing no regard for the customs and religions of the people, and treating their idea of divinity as vain and silly. He judged the gods of Egypt in the plagues, even by putting out the light of their supreme deity, the sun. So, to have no other gods before Him, that is, in front of His face, the face of the God who is everywhere, is to make the judgment that only the people of Israel, believing in the One God who made Heaven and Earth, have the truth.

Syncretism was expected in the ancient world, a polite recognition of the various gods of the different places where nations settled. If nothing else, it was just bad manners to treat any religion as false, any god as a mere idol, and any practice as an abomination. Of course, when it became necessary to save mankind from the worst kind of paganism, the better kind came to the rescue; the Romans defeated the Carthaginian Hannibal whose army fought to spread the madness of child sacrifice everywhere. And, nowhere does this receive treatment that has better insight than in The Everlasting Man by G. K. Chesterton.

But, even the Romans fell short of the Israelite standard, the worship of one and only one God, the maker of all things and judge of all men. They allowed the Jews to worship the God of their fathers only because He was the God of their fathers. They tolerated Jewish intolerance out of respect for its antiquity. But, they persecuted the Christians who converted from among the Gentiles, using the excuse that they were rejecting the gods of their fathers and the worship of Caesar. And, even during the early days of the Christian Church, as recorded in the Book of Acts, the Emperor Claudius sought to banish all Jews from the City of Rome itself. The idea of any religion that could not take an equal place among the devotions to the various gods of the peoples was completely strange to ancient peoples everywhere.

Yet, what we know that the pagans of antiquity did not know, is that the revelation of God to man was a gift and the offer of salvation. Jewish monotheism was intolerant of the gods for the same reason that men of medicine are intolerant of folk remedies. The real trouble with all people everywhere is that two-sided coin of sin and death; so the intolerance of Judaism for idolatry was a necessary first step toward what would become the mission of the Church. Inherent in the first commandment of the Law of Moses is the Great Commission of the Risen Christ. “Thou shalt have no other gods in my presence-before my face” is echoed in the words, “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. (Matt. 28: 19, 20).” It is expressed in the words of Saint Peter, “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved (Acts 4:12).” Emmanuel, “in ancient times did give the Law, in cloud and majesty and awe,” and now He stood risen from the dead to authorize the Church to go with His presence to all nations, going everywhere among fallen mankind and with all their gods before His face, to root up, pull down and destroy, and to build and to plant. Jesus Christ, after dying on the cross for the sins of the whole world, gave us our commission. He is the only salvation revealed by the only true God, Whom to know is eternal life (John 17:3).

This is the meaning of the wise men coming from afar to worship Him in His infancy. Any other kind of writing would have told us all about these men; where they came from, how large their company really was, and details about the route they took, and alternative route by which they returned. But, sacred scripture was composed by the Holy Ghost, and the focus in the Gospel of Matthew is on Jesus Himself. Therefore, all these interesting details about the Magi have become the study of modern historians and archeologists uncovering a mystery, because the Gospel had no space to give to such minor issues. It focuses attention on the salvation of God in the person of Jesus, and it tells His story. The Holy family’s flight into Egypt and return to Galilee is given the space that follows, and the three wise men – or Magi – simply disappear back to the place from which they came. But, their significance is not lost.

Their significance is taken up by Saint Paul in the Epistle we have heard today, about the Jews and Gentiles being made one new man in Christ, the middle wall of division broken down. We, that is those of us whose ancestry is from the Gentiles, are one with the people of Israel through faith in Jesus Christ. A gentile- that is, anybody who is not of Jewish descent- becomes grafted into the heritage of the people of God, made a child of Abraham by faith in Jesus Christ. This is why I have never been impressed by the apologists for women’s “ordination” when they argue that Christ chose only Jews, and so if we do not believe that women can be ordained based upon His example of choosing only men, we should be consistent and logical, and realize that this would mean we should not allow Gentiles to be ordained. The reason their argument does not make sense is contained in the truth revealed to the apostles and prophets, as taught in today’s Epistle: No Christian is a Gentile. When you were baptized you were taken out of your wild Gentile tree, and grafted into the cultivated tree of Israel.

It is a basic understanding of salvation itself, as Isaiah prophesied that the Root of Israel would grow and blossom and fill the earth, the same earth that is to be “filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord as the waters cover the sea (Isa. 27:6, Hab. 2:14)” that upon being made part of the Church, one becomes a part of the Israel of God. By faith Abraham is our father, the Lord is our God, and there is salvation in none other than His Son (Rom. 4:11, Acts 4:12). All of our beliefs are based firmly upon revelation, and not based on even the best speculations of the wisest of men.

The difference between revelation and imagination is the difference between the true God and every idol. Even the unseen and unfelt idols of the mind, housed in the Arian speculations of Muslims and Unitarians of an unrevealed and lonely brand of monotheism that cannot possess the eternal attribute of love because it is alone, is an idol. A god who cannot be seen, touched, heard and even tasted, is the new kind of idol; for, “the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth (John 1:14).” Apart from this revelation of the Wholly Other uncreated God taking our time and space world into His Person; apart from the revelation of this invisible deity found in fashion as a man whose glory is beheld; apart from this unknowable God being known in the Person of the Incarnate Word, there is no salvation. There is no salvation in all of the other gods that men worship before His Face.

We have the Great Commission to spread the knowledge of the only true God and Jesus Christ whom he has sent. Thou shalt have no other gods in front of His face, for neither is there salvation in any other. The name of Jesus is given under heaven among men, whereby we must be saved. Each of you, as a member of Christ's Body the Church, is being called to take your part of this great work that Christ gave to His Church from the beginning, of which prophets had spoken from the dawn of history. You can see that as a reason to be excited and motivated. I hope you will.


13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Fr Hart,
Thanks for that, and especially for the useful ammo about the abolition of gentile status for those who elect to be grafted into Israel. Another feminist/revisionist piece of casuistry can thereby be demolished.

desertowl

Truth Unites... and Divides said...

"We have the Great Commission to spread the knowledge of the only true God and Jesus Christ whom he has sent. ... Each of you, as a member of Christ's Body the Church, are being called to take your part of this great work that Christ gave to His Church from the beginning, of which prophets had spoken from the dawn of history."

I agree. And I'd like to pose a real question to you, Fr. Hart. Suppose you were a member, either lay or clergy, of a parish in The Episcopal Church. Would the command to fulfill the Great Commission be impacted, either negatively or positively, by being involved and a constituent member of TEc?

I direct you to this comment in this thread whereby reference is made to the Anglican Communion Institute's recognition of the importance of the Great Commission when they explicitly write:

"Commitment to the evangelization and teaching of those who do not follow Christ as Lord and Savior, and service to those in need and distress."

And to presumably further this commitment, the ACI scholars (Seitz, Radner, and Turner) write this:

"It is a form of delusion and disobedience to place oneself and ones friends outside the judgment God intends for the health of his church."

Which presumably is directed towards those considering leaving TEc (or perhaps even those who have already left).

Anyways, I found this latter statement rather striking by ACI. And it engendered this response by Fr. Gibson which I highly recommend you to look at.

So I should like to ask you, good Fr. Hart, what do you think of the fulfillment of the Great Commission in TEc churches and the bringing of folks into TEc churches as espoused and recommended by the highly esteemed, highly degreed, and highly recognized and respected scholars of ACI (Professors Seitz, Radner, and Turner) who are committed to being inside strategists or witnesses of TEc?

Fr. Robert Hart said...

So I should like to ask you, good Fr. Hart, what do you think of the fulfillment of the Great Commission in TEc churches and the bringing of folks into TEc churches...?

It is completely irresponsible to lead people into TE"C". It is like directing them into any other non-Christian cult, if not worse.

Truth Unites... and Divides said...

"It is completely irresponsible to lead people into TE"C". It is like directing them into any other non-Christian cult, if not worse."

Strong words. I take it, then, that you disagree with the ACI professors Seitz, Radner, and Seitz on this particular issue of evangelism for TEc members.

So, let's take this one step further and assume that you're correct (which I do) that it's completely irresponsible to lead or invite a new believer into a TEc church.

So if a TEc church member cannot fulfill the Great Commission because it would be "completely irresponsible" to do so within the confines of a TEc parish, diocese, and denomination, then what would you suggest that this TEc member do, bearing in mind that the highly esteemed and praised ACI scholars have intoned:

"It is a form of delusion and disobedience to place oneself and ones friends outside the judgment God intends for the health of his church."

Fr. Robert Hart said...

By no means can TE"C" be considered part of the Church at all. It has Christians in it, but so do the Democrat and Republican Parties, the Boy Scouts and the Elk's Club.

The Church is the Ark of salvation so that souls may be saved from the judgment that this world cannot escape. As for Divine Fatherly discipline, TE"C" clearly has been "given over" in the sense that St. Paul uses that phrase in Romans chapter 1. The people running it would not know how to recognize any sort of Fatherly discipline anyway, so the fact that they are beyond that, in the worst possible condition, should surprise no one.

Truth Unites... and Divides said...

Dear Fr. Hart,

Let me rephrase the question. If a Christian cannot or should not fulfill the Great Commission because he or she is a member of TEc, either clergy or lay, should that person or parish or diocese remain in TEc?

For example, consider these words from Rector Russell Levenson, Jr who is rector of the largest church in TEc, something like 8,200 people, and who is staying in TEc:

"we feel we must continue to do that within TEC, and to have not only the Scriptures and the words of our Lord as a foundation for that effort, but also the encouragement of great men like George Carey, Chris Seitz, Ephraim Radner, Phil Turner, and—perhaps most especially, John Stott—to have this encouragement says a great deal about the hope and common vision we share."

Fr. Hart, is rector Levenson Jr. doing the right thing given that "By no means can TE"C" be considered part of the Church at all" and "It is completely irresponsible to lead people into TE"C". It is like directing them into any other non-Christian cult, if not worse"?

I think I know your answer, but what do you say or can you say to TEc-Institutionalists like Levenson Jr., Radner, Seitz, Turner, Sarah Hey, Kendall Harmon, et al?

Fr. Robert Hart said...

How can we answer the question of whether or not TE"C" members should fulfill the Great Commission, when we believe that, from within that cult, they cannot do so? To witness for Jesus, yes. But, fulfilling the Great Commission (which is what you have been asking about) involves baptism followed by true discipleship. That requires the Church as the Church.

As for TE"C", our message to all those who are still there, is: "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." Rev. 18:4

Truth Unites... and Divides said...

As for TE"C", our message to all those who are still there, is: "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." Rev. 18:4

(Softly chuckles). But, but, but, but, but Fr. Hart, the Institutionalist-Enablers don't like and don't want your message. They think you're mean-spirited, divisive, unloving, schismatic, judgmental, and self-righteous. They think that you should have an epiphany whereby you can see the wisdom of what ACI has said:

"It is a form of delusion and disobedience to place oneself and ones friends outside the judgment God intends for the health of his church."

I.e., that everyone is to stay in TEc!!!

Fr. Robert Hart said...

Let's reword that.

"It is a form of delusion and disobedience to place oneself and ones friends outside the judgment God intends for Babylon."

Hmmm.

Truth Unites... and Divides said...

I like your version! I want to play too. Here's my rewording of ACI's dictum:

"It is a form of delusion and disobedience to place oneself and ones friends outside the judgment God intends for The Episcopal Church's Modern Day Institution of Sodom and Gomorrah."

ACI = Anglican Communion Idiots.

poetreader said...

TUaD,

Hmm. The sentiment, I would say, is pretty much accurate, but I need to say what I often say to myself about the apparent attitude. Our Lord gave a very serious caution to us that are tempted to clothe truth in insults:

Matthew 5:22. But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

It is certainly in order to point out the idiocy of what is being proclaimed, but I don't believe we are authorized or qualified to be so dismissive or contemptuous of the person. I know the temptation to move from one thought to the other, and have often done so, but I also know that doing so does not win an erring brother, and certainly is unhelpful to my own soul.

ed

Truth Unites... and Divides said...

"It is certainly in order to point out the idiocy of what is being proclaimed..."

Okay. Revising:

ACI = Anglican Communion Idiocy.

poetreader said...

Y'know, I'll buy that.

I do have to say, though, that it's not infrequent for me to manifest my own varieties of idiocy. While it's certainly not my favorite food, perhaps the most nutritious is the crow I'm forever having to eat.

The Taste of Repentance

Crow pie,
oh, my!
Before I die,
feed me crow pie.

I make so many terrific gaffs and have to retract so often that I'm very hesitant to do any more than quietly point out where someone's errors are.

ed