A PLACE WHERE THOSE WHO LIVE IN THE ANGLICAN CONTINUUM, OR WHO ARE THINKING OF MOVING THERE, MIGHT SHARE IN ROBUST, IF POLITE, DISCUSSION OF MATTERS THEOLOGICAL AND ECCLESIOLOGICAL. QUOD UBIQUE, QUOD SEMPER, QUOD AB OMNIBUS CREDITUM EST
Monday, August 30, 2021
To Anti-vaccine zealots
Sunday, August 29, 2021
13th Sunday after Trinity 2021
Sunday, August 22, 2021
12th Sunday after Trinity 2021
Sunday, August 15, 2021
Sunday, August 08, 2021
Friday, August 06, 2021
The Transfiguration August 6
II Pet. 1:13f Luke 9:28f
In the spirit of
the Confessions of Saint Augustine, let me say that during a few years in my
youth, I embraced a form of Protestant Evangelicalism. This was probably
because the Episcopal priest who had prepared me for Confirmation, in 1971,
drained the spiritual adventure out of Christianity. The Confirmation itself
was quite a powerful experience; but the kind of rubbish that he presented for
education as to what it was, and how I should respond to the grace of God given
in the sacrament, seemed more a course in skepticism and almost agnosticism
than in the Catholic Faith once delivered to the saints, and preserved and
taught by the Church of the Fathers. The problem began when the very modern
priest, all too typical of the 1960s and early 70s, told us that, really, there
was no devil. It got worse as it went along.
When I came across people who took their faith very seriously, I was among
Evangelicals in the Charismatic movement. And, though much was good, and the
people were quite sincere, I found in those years that present in a certain kind of Protestant
mentality, is a strong resistance to what they call "religion." These
folks loaded the word "religion" with many negative connotations,
depicting especially Catholics in many prejudiced ways; equating
"religion" with superstition, or even with hypocrisy. So, if I sound
a little hard on their way of thinking, please understand that my criticism is
not without both charity and genuine pity.
Having been an Episcopalian since 1958, I grew up in a Church that was still
Anglican, and that had quite a lot in common with the people that those friends
of mine called Catholics, because, really, we are Catholic; that is, we believe in the Catholic
Faith and the Catholic Church that we speak of in the Creeds. We have just said
"I believe One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church." We regard
ourselves to be among the inheritors of that Faith and Church along with our
brethren who are Roman Catholics, and Eastern Orthodox. Having been brought up
in the sort of Anglican household that appreciated the continuity of the Faith
with that of the ancient Church, it was only a matter of time before I would
again hunger for that very thing that my Evangelical friends regarded with
great suspicion, namely "religion."
When we look at the Gospel for this Feast of the Transfiguration, we cannot
appreciate its depths if we fear those things which are specifically
"religious" in its presentation. Christ our Lord was on the mountain,
a place that for Jews symbolized the revelation of God, going all the way back
to Moses. It was as He was in prayer that He was transfigured. This is very
important. For, the chief reason why many of the Protestants I was close to, in
my youth, would step away from their perception of "religion" had
everything to do with a hesitation to embrace and love that most important of
all doctrines, that central revelation of God, the Incarnation. I have said
this before when speaking of the sacraments, specifically the Blessed Sacrament
of the Altar, the Communion with the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ.
In all of their very sincere love for Jesus, there came a point, nonetheless,
when they had a very difficult time with those aspects of our faith that involve
the senses of taste, touch, seeing, and hearing. Any honor given to the Blessed
Virgin mother of our Lord was, for them, uncomfortable. They profess belief in
the two natures of Jesus Christ, that He is both Fully God and fully Man in One
Person; but in every practical way,
they fear and step back from the full implications of what that means. They
fear to come close, fearing all of the echoes and ripples of what it means that
"the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us." They confuse the
implications of this, and misunderstand those things as if they were some sort
of idolatry.
Please do not misunderstand me. They were, as I knew them, full of faith, and
quite sincere. But I say these things for your sake, that you will never fear
to embrace the saving revelation that "the Word was made flesh and pitched
the tent of His human nature among us." I say these things so that you
will be liberated in your heart and conscience to come close and touch Christ.
I say this, because of how Saint John (one of those three apostles who are part
of today’s Gospel reading) described what the Church truly is, and what it
shall continue to be for all time until Christ returns on the Last Day. In the
opening of his first Epistle, the Beloved Disciple wrote:
(I John 1: 1-4)
You see, the fear is that worshiping Someone Whom we see, and touch and hear must be some form of idolatry. Let me help you by being very clear. Once you know that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, it is idolatry to worship only a god whom we cannot see. Idolatry is to worship the images we ourselves make from our own minds, and therefore, it is to worship a god who is not the One known by the revelation He gives of Himself. We, who would bow down at the feet of the Man Jesus, should He walk into this room right now, would not be idolaters. Our God is not confined to heaven. The true God revealed Himself, most perfectly by taking human nature into the Divine Person of the only and eternally begotten Son of the Everlasting Father.
This is why we are not afraid to, as the hymn says, "touch and handle
things unseen"- nor even to look upon visible things that both effect and
signify what is invisible. We are not afraid of holy water, or visible
reprentations such as icons and crosses. We do not treat the Blessed Virgin
Mother, through Whom God the Son recieved His human nature, as some sort of
outcast. Furthermore, we know that the bread and wine that will be placed upon
this altar today, will be taken into the Person of the Son of God, and given
back to us as "the spiritual food of the most precious Body and Blood
of...our Saviour Jesus Christ." And, as the Apostle John wrote, we will
look upon, and our hands will handle the Word of Life." In this way, you
will have fellowship with the Church of the Apostles, and in that fellowship
you will have fellowship with God the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ,
"that your joy may be full."
On the Mount of Transfiguration, which Saint Peter called "the holy
mount"- itself a phrase showing the effect of the presence of the
incarnate Lord upon all creation- what the apostles saw was not actually the
Divine Nature itself, because that remains invisible to the eyes of every
created thing. What they saw was the Shekinah,
the manifest Glory of God. They saw a manifestation of our ultimate hope, theosis. They saw that human
nature itself is transformed by the presence of God; a certain kind of
blindness, that protects the eyes of our yet fallen and imperfect humanity, was
removed for a brief glimpse of deified human nature. Christ’s human nature was
revealed to be glorious, because in His Person he is fully God. Because of
God's human nature in Christ, our transformed and resurrected human nature is
destined to be glorified by grace when we partake of the divine nature, as
Saint Peter wrote earlier in the same epistle appointed for today
(II Pet. 1:4).
In the Transfiguration of our Lord we see our hope, and we see why we need have
no fear of death. Christ let His disciples see why His coming death should not
fill them with dread. How strange that in this scene, while shining with the
light of His glory, the Lord speaks to Moses and Elijah about the death He
would accomplish at Jerusalem. Notice, His death would be His own to give. This
was Luke’s way of telling us the same thing that John tells. No Man took His
life away; He laid it down freely, and freely took it again. In speaking of His
death to Moses, Christ showed that He was going to fulfill all the Law, and be
the One Who dies for us that our sins could forever be taken away; that in
dying He would fulfill the types and shadows of every sacrifice ever offered on
the Old Testament altars. In speaking with Elijah, He showed that He is the
fulfillment and subject of prophecy itself. It is He of Whom Moses and the
prophets spoke. And, in this scene on the holy mountain, it is He of Whom the
Father speaks: "This is my Beloved Son; hear Him."
The way into the holy of holies, to the throne of God, is Christ's own human nature, as says the Epistle to the Hebrews.
"Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh; And having an high priest over the house of God; Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water. (Heb. 10:19-22)."
I want the words of this sermon to ring in your ears, because my desire for you is that you never fear to come close and touch the Lord; that you never fear to live within the fellowship of the Church, and by that, within the fellowship of God the Father and of His Son Jesus Christ; that your joy may be full.
And now, unto God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost, be ascribed,
as is most justly due, all might, majesty, dominion, glory and power, now and
forever. Amen
+
Thursday, August 05, 2021
David Virtue's interview of Yours Truly
Sunday, August 01, 2021
Sunday, July 25, 2021
Thursday, July 22, 2021
Sunday, July 18, 2021
Saturday, July 10, 2021
Saturday, July 03, 2021
5th SUNDAY FATER TRINITY & INDEPENDENCE DAY 2021
Monday, June 28, 2021
THE NEW ANTIPATRIOTS
Following
the 2020 election in the United States a number of supporters of the incumbent President
were dissatisfied with the results. Two courses of action were followed. One
course was by a team of lawyers representing the reelection campaign of Donald
Trump. They filed sixty-four lawsuits in various states. The suits alleged
massive voter fraud and sought the overturning of official certifications in
those states. Court records are a matter of public record, so one can research
the data without relying on the news media. This is what I found. Of those
sixty-four court cases three were dismissed for Lack of Standing. Four were
dismissed for Lack of Cause (not alleging enough instances of voter fraud to
justify the sought remedy). The overwhelming number of cases, all of the remaining
fifty-seven, were dismissed or withdrawn by the reelection campaign’s own lawyers
for Lack of Evidence. Very well. The reelection campaign exercised their legal
rights. One could say that their method, going to court, was in keeping with
respect for the United States and the Rule of Law.
But the other course of action was the very opposite of
patriotism. It was, in fact, treasonous; not against a political entity as
such, but against the Rule of Law. The Rule of Law and Democracy share reciprocal
protection. And in the United States the highest law of the land is the Constitution.
Attackers broke into the Capitol Building at almost two o’clock in the
afternoon of January 6, 2021 (hereafter to be called the Epiphany Putsch),
having walked across the Washington D.C. Mall from a rally held by the defeated
President. They chanted “Hang Mike Pence!” and had actually constructed a
gallows with a hangman’s noose on a dangling rope. He was presiding over the
Senate at that moment. They also voiced an intention to kill the Speaker of the
House. Both houses of Congress were in session, not to decide anything, but to
carry out the Constitutionally required duty of certifying the votes already presented
by the Electors.
If indeed the President of the Senate (i.e., the Vice
President of the United States) and the Speaker of the House of Representatives
had died in that attack, a Constitutional crisis unlike anything in history
could have created a legal loophole that had the potential to work as a coup
against the Constitution of the United States, against the Rule of Law and its reciprocal
protection of Democracy. An incumbent who had lost by the Rule of Law might
have held onto power against everything the Founding Fathers clearly intended
for the country. The actual box containing the physical votes of the Electors
was spirited away to safety along with all the members of both houses. No one can
say that the attackers acted in keeping with respect for the United States and
the Rule of Law. They were certainly not patriots. Just the opposite.
NO
AMERICAN REVOLUTION
The tragedy is that the most outspoken insurrectionists among
them had been so terribly deceived that they wrongly imagined themselves to be
patriots. Some thought they were acting in the same spirit as the Founders of
the country. This is partly due to a seriously flawed education. What happened
in the United States is called the Revolutionary War or the American
Revolution, a war that lasted from April 19, 1775 to September 3, 1783, and
that birthed the independence of the United States in July 1776. We have always
called it a revolution. Even the greatest Founding Father of them all (in my
humble opinion), John Adams, called it a revolution. But was it? The Americans
did not overthrow the King and Parliament of Great Britain. It was a war of
Independence; but it was not a revolution by dictionary definition. It was not
a coup either. The problem with calling it a revolution is that this habit has
produced a complete misunderstanding that is having dangerous consequences in
our own time.
When the British colonies were founded, with their thirteen
respective royal charters, they were fully empowered by the Crown and The
Parliament to establish colonial legislatures. This they did, each and every
one. Theirs was the binding legal authority recognized by the Parliament and
commanded by the Crown. When, for example, the Boston Massacre occurred (March
5, 1770), the soldiers who killed the colonists
were tried for murder. Their defense counsel, John Adams, obtained an acquittal
by convincing the jury that the soldiers were young men who acted out of fear
for their lives. The real point is this: That recognition of the laws of the
colonies, established by their own legislatures, was respected by Great Britain.
Later, by 1775, things had changed. So it was that when war broke
out because the British had become increasingly heavy-handed, it was not, as the
much later 2021 Epiphany Putsch attackers of the Capitol Building
wrongly believed about American history, a sudden uprising of rebels. Not at
all. The mislabeled American “Revolution” was a perfectly legal act, carried
out within the Rule of Law to preserve the Rule of Law. Each Colonial Legislature,
the actual legal authority in each colony by Royal Charter, agreed to appoint
the Continental Congress, and each legislature sent their delegates to Philadelphia.
It was in that lawfully constituted Congress that Independence from Great
Britain was voted on quite properly, and in which it passed on July 2, 1776. It
was publicly announced two days later on July 4, which we celebrate as
Independence Day. In short, Parliament back in London, with the aid of the King,
was guilty of violating the Rule of Law, all thirteen Colonial Charters, and
empowering their soldiers to come to these shores and break those laws in any manner
they chose. They usurped power over the properly established legal authorities,
and therefore exercised tyranny.
But the Epiphany Putsch insurrectionists (and by
definition that is the correct word to use for them) were nothing like the
Founding Fathers. They acted in complete disregard for the Rule of Law. They
had nothing in common with the people who fought in the war for American Independence.
And they were the very opposite of patriots because they rejected the Rule of
Law, even after the courts had properly ruled sixty-four times. They were
actually terrorists at that point. And they were just as pathetic as those
ridiculous organizations that proclaim themselves to be state militias despite
the fact that no state has ever authorized any of them, and so they are not
regulated, let alone “well regulated,” and so not really militias at all.
WHY ON THIS CHRISTIAN BLOG?
Some may ask why I am making this point about secular history
on a blog about Continuing Anglicanism. What has it to do with our specific
concerns? I will begin to answer by saying that nothing in life is, for us, entirely
secular. If we are believers, God is always involved in our lives, the
decisions we make, the values we hold, and especially in matters that touch on issues
of morality and on peace among ourselves. Currently, in the United States, we
face a new danger. In place of what was once an intellectually rigorous form of
Conservative thought, possessing a willingness to hold debates, to express different
opinions, and accept the outcome of elections within the Rule of Law with its
reciprocal protection of Democracy, there is in this time a new brand of anti-intellectual
Right-wing violence that dares to masquerade as “Patriotism.” But true
patriotism for Americans is nothing if not respect for the Constitution and the
order it maintains.
Far too many of our own people are being deceived by these
efforts, efforts that consist of insane, and I say demonic, Conspiracy Theories,
with calls for violence and a “new civil war.” Everyone who is too sane to be
lulled into the mass hysteria of this paranoia is accused of being unpatriotic.
The whole movement is largely fueled by a desire to throw away our cherished Rule
of Law in favor of the rule of men, specifically of one man. A very real
problem exists among us even in our own churches: People advocating violence against
their fellow citizens.
“Then said Jesus unto him, “Put
up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall
perish with the sword (Matt. 26:52).’”
It is demonic voices that call for blood and rage. Those who
follow the Son of Man are forbidden to even entertain the thought of such
things. Conservative thought has been replaced, on all the major outlets, by
the “Chicken Little” New Right. Its message of a falling sky, with the evil bogeymen
of socialism, gays, Muslims, immigrants (shudder), CRT, and “Jewish space-lasers,”
etc., has created even within Christian circles the worst kind of fear, the
kind that turns to hate.
“Perfect love casteth out fear (I John 4:18).”
“Because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax
cold (Matt. 24:12).”
Unbelievers will do what unbelievers do. You are not called
to fear the world, nor to take up arms for the Kingdom of God (John 18:36). You
are called to be salt and light. Do not be one of those who hide their light,
and among the salt that has lost its savor.

