THE REVELATION OF THE TRINITY AND SALVATION
We
are given glimpses and indications about the Trinity all throughout the Old
Testament, beginning with the fact that God is one, but is spoken of in the
plural nonetheless. For the word translated most often as God is rendered in
the plural. Elohim (אלהים), the plural,
is used rather than simply El (אל), which is singular. This is
consistent with many things that appear quite mysteriously in the Book of
Genesis, and continue throughout the writings of the Old Testament. The most
famous of statements that declare this truth, that there is only one God, is in
the Book of Deuteronomy: "Hear,
O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD (Deut. 6:4)." When the holiness of God is proclaimed to the prophet Isaiah
by angels in the temple, he is "Holy, Holy, Holy (Isaiah 6:3).”
Nonetheless, we are told many times that God is one, and there is no other beside him. "Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour (Isaiah 43: 10, 11)." In this same book God often reveals his relationship withIsrael in various triads, such as: "I
am the LORD, your Holy One, the creator of Israel , your King"(43:15). God
is one (אחד) and plural (אלהים). God is
invisible, and yet was seen in visions by prophets.
Nonetheless, we are told many times that God is one, and there is no other beside him. "Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour (Isaiah 43: 10, 11)." In this same book God often reveals his relationship with
But, let us never imagine that the Trinity presents us
with a problem of mathematics. The mystery of the Trinity is not a mystery of
how God can be three in one, and one in three. That, in itself, is really not
so hard to understand; and so St. Patrick used something as simple as the
shamrock, one leaf that is also three leaves, to illustrate the unity of the
Trinity.1 Without being mathematicians, we can understand that one may equal
any number. That is not the mystery. The mystery is God, a mystery so great
that the joy of eternity is growing in the knowledge of God forever, ever
deepening knowledge that cannot be exhausted, for "his greatness is
unsearchable (Psalm 145:3)." Infinity is too small a concept to weigh
against God.
Like all revelation, the doctrine of the Trinity is filled with mystery to such
an extent that we can be sure of one thing: No human mind dreamed it up. No
human mind can contemplate God except by some use of created things, for the
human mind is part of creation, lives in creation, and cannot leap out of that
into the uncreated reality we call God. We can know God, nonetheless, because
God has taken the initiative to reveal himself. And, this revelation cannot be
separated from our salvation from sin and death.
The salvation which we celebrate, as God has given it to us, is historical and
it is future. It is also iconic and sacramental.
"God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spoke in time past unto
the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son,
whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; Who
being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and
upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged
our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high (Hebrews 1:1-3).”
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him;
and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the
life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness
comprehended it not. There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The
same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him
might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that
Light. That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the
world. He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew
him not. He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as
received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them
that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the
flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the Word was made flesh, and
dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of
the Father,) full of grace and truth (John 1:1-14).” 2
The original Greek word for "image" in Colossians 1:15, speaking of Christ Himself ("Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature...") is the word εἰκών (eikon), which simply comes over into English as "icon." The Fathers who gathered for the second Council of Nicea knew that the heresy of the Iconoclasts contained an essential danger. The Iconoclasts failed to understand the difference between Christian icons and pagan idols. Christian icons are based on revelation, especially the ultimate revelation, the Incarnation: "The Word was made flesh." Pagan idols are a deception, taught by human imagination at best, by demons at worst, to lure men away from the true God. Icons, on the other hand, are based on revelation, and point to the Truth. The true God is known only through the Son (John 14:6, 17:3). The Fathers at that Second Council of Nicea (787 AD) knew that if the Church rejected icons they might also come to reject the iconic nature of revelation, the truth that the Word was made flesh. In time, they could refuse to believe in the Son, as he has been revealed through his human nature. In time, the knowledge of God could be lost, if the Iconoclasts were to prevail.
The original Greek word for "image" in Colossians 1:15, speaking of Christ Himself ("Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature...") is the word εἰκών (eikon), which simply comes over into English as "icon." The Fathers who gathered for the second Council of Nicea knew that the heresy of the Iconoclasts contained an essential danger. The Iconoclasts failed to understand the difference between Christian icons and pagan idols. Christian icons are based on revelation, especially the ultimate revelation, the Incarnation: "The Word was made flesh." Pagan idols are a deception, taught by human imagination at best, by demons at worst, to lure men away from the true God. Icons, on the other hand, are based on revelation, and point to the Truth. The true God is known only through the Son (John 14:6, 17:3). The Fathers at that Second Council of Nicea (787 AD) knew that if the Church rejected icons they might also come to reject the iconic nature of revelation, the truth that the Word was made flesh. In time, they could refuse to believe in the Son, as he has been revealed through his human nature. In time, the knowledge of God could be lost, if the Iconoclasts were to prevail.
Iconoclasm had come from a new religion that had only recently appeared in
human history (I John 2:18), a Medieval
desert unitarianism. A lonely God of a teacher foretold by the Apostle John (I Jn. 2:18) would become the combination of all antichrists who had come before, be
they Gnostic or Arian. This god cannot understand love, because he is not the
One-Elohim of Israel ,
known more fully by the Church as "the Father and the Son and the Holy
Spirit." The doctrine of the Trinity teaches us that "God is
love," as St. John
put it (I John 4:8,16). But, about a god who is one and only one, through and
through, with no plurality of Persons in him, we cannot speak of love; rather
of an emptiness, a void in which eternity knows no compassion. G.K. Chesterton
wrote of this.
"To us Trinitarians (if I may say it with reverence) -- to us God Himself
is a society. It is indeed a fathomless mystery of theology, and even if I were
theologian enough to deal with it directly, it would not be relevant to do so
here. Suffice it to say here that this triple enigma is as comforting as wine
and open as an English fireside; that this thing that bewilders the intellect
utterly quiets the heart: but out of the desert, from the dry places and, the
dreadful suns, come the cruel children of the lonely God; the real Unitarians
who with scimitar in hand have laid waste the world. For it is not well for God
to be alone."3
Our salvation is revealed in iconic language and in the Icon of the Father,
because to know the Son is to know the Father also. Apart from the Word made flesh
we cannot know God. "But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are
lost: In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which
believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image (again, εἰκών) of God, should shine unto them. For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus
the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake. For God, who commanded
the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the
light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ (II
Corinthians 4:3-6).” We know God because we know the Son, and we know Him
because he is also a man.
The Word is spoken of by St. John
in the Trinitarian opening of his Gospel, where God is thrice named, and where,
when God is named the second time, "the Word was God." Further on we
see, "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his
glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and
truth." What did we behold, even as it was disguised in his human
features? We beheld "the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ."
And, what we beheld in that face was compassion, such compassion as a lonely
god would not have. We beheld love, the love of the Father in the love of the
Son, expressed most clearly on the cross when he poured out His soul unto death
to redeem fallen mankind, to save us from sin and death. And, we behold Him,
after death, rising again and forever keeping our own human nature within the
very Godhead. The revelation of God in Jesus Christ is entwined with the
revelation that God is three in one and one in three.
Our salvation, as revealed, is sacramental. It stems from the Incarnation, and depends on the death and resurrection of Christ, from which flow the power and grace that are given to us by the Holy Spirit, as he uses the means of grace through his Church. Without the atonement Christ worked for us on the cross, and by His rising again, we would have no absolution, no baptism, no Communion. Without the Holy Spirit present and active in the Church, this grace would never be imparted through the preached word and through the sacraments. For, it is the Holy Spirit, the other Comforter (παράκλητος, paraklētos), who imparts every grace that flows from the Incarnate, crucified and risen Son.
Our salvation, as revealed, is sacramental. It stems from the Incarnation, and depends on the death and resurrection of Christ, from which flow the power and grace that are given to us by the Holy Spirit, as he uses the means of grace through his Church. Without the atonement Christ worked for us on the cross, and by His rising again, we would have no absolution, no baptism, no Communion. Without the Holy Spirit present and active in the Church, this grace would never be imparted through the preached word and through the sacraments. For, it is the Holy Spirit, the other Comforter (παράκλητος, paraklētos), who imparts every grace that flows from the Incarnate, crucified and risen Son.
The risen Christ gave commandment to baptize "in the Name of the Father
and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." (Matthew 28:19) St. Basil reminds
us, in his book On the Holy Spirit, that this Trinitarian Name is one
Name, not three names. We do not baptize in the names, but in the Name.
Comparing the 17th chapter of the Gospel of John to the 28th chapter of
Matthew, we see a progression. In John, before his death, He says:
"Father...I have declared unto them thy name, and will declare it: that
the love wherewith thou hast loved me may be in them, and I in them (John
17:26).” And, in Matthew, the Name of God is more fully revealed when He
commands the Church to baptize, by telling us the name into which we baptize.
"The Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit." This ultimate
revelation of the Name (H’Shem) of
God came from the mouth of the risen Lord Jesus Christ after he had perfected
the work of our redemption, salvation and justification. (How fitting that we
read the conversation between the Lord and Nicodemus on Trinity Sunday, since
baptism, the new birth, is part of the revelation that God is the Father and
the Son and the Holy Ghost).
The correct pronunciation of the mysterious Name of God has been lost, despite
fruitless efforts to figure it out. We may have an indication from the prophet
Jeremiah that this loss was God's own work, a loss indeed, but to the end that
we gain something greater (Jeremiah 44:26). For in place of a name that is only
mystery, we have a greater revelation of a name that declares who our God is.
We may not know how to pronounce the name spoken by Moses and the prophets;
but, we know the God of Moses and the prophets more fully by the Name of the
Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. And, we have learned this Name through
the human life of the Son of God, His personal history of being conceived in
the womb of his mother, Mary the Virgin, the Theotokos. We know His
history of going about doing good, healing all who were oppressed by the devil,
teaching and preaching the kingdom
of God , preparing His
disciples, dying for the sins of the world, rising again from the dead,
ascending to the Father and pouring out the Holy Spirit. We have learned the
revelation of the Trinity because God is our salvation.
1. See my article Threefold Chords about how J.S.Bach used music to present a theological demonstration of the Trinity.
2. John used the phrase "in the beginning" to
remind us of Genesis, and to get behind the opening of that first book of the
Bible. What we call "Genesis" is called, in Hebrew, בראשית (B'Rasheet).
It is simply the first word, which we translate into English with three words:
"In the beginning." John used the Greek translation that opens this
same first book of the Bible in the LXX. It was popular years ago to emphasize
the first four words of the English translation. "In the beginning
God." But, in fact, the word for "created," ( ברא, bora)
is the second word in the Hebrew text, and the word we translate as
"God" (that plural word, אלהים, Elohim) is third. In the
Hebrew syntax the word for "created" directly follows "In the
beginning." It is the opening of John's Gospel that moves the emphasis
from the work of God to God as God. The Apostle goes behind the scene of
Genesis 1:1 to draw our attention from creation to God. This is because the New
Covenant gives the knowledge of God in greater glory.
3. From Orthodoxy, by G.K. Chesterton. (chapter
VIII)