A PLACE WHERE THOSE WHO LIVE IN THE ANGLICAN CONTINUUM, OR WHO ARE THINKING OF MOVING THERE, MIGHT SHARE IN ROBUST, IF POLITE, DISCUSSION OF MATTERS THEOLOGICAL AND ECCLESIOLOGICAL. QUOD UBIQUE, QUOD SEMPER, QUOD AB OMNIBUS CREDITUM EST
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
Sunday, June 26, 2016
The Mushy Thinking of Neo-Anglicans
The Body is broken because of willfulness of its members to innovate, accommodate to culture, and set aside the Received Tradition in favor of a subjective modernist approach to truth. In another, earlier context, Archbishop Haverland spoke of the Neo-Anglicans as being in "the slow lane to modernist mush."
By Alice C. Linsley
Special to VIRTUEONLINE
http://www.virtueonline.org/mushy-thinking-neo-anglicans
June 26, 2016
Special to VIRTUEONLINE
http://www.virtueonline.org/mushy-thinking-neo-anglicans
June 26, 2016
On June 23, 2016 the College
of Bishops of the Anglican Church in North America consented to the election of the Rev Jim
Hobby as the next bishop of the Anglican Diocese of Pittsburgh. Fr. Hobby will
be yet another bishop married to a woman priest. How many does that make now in
the ACNA?
Such bishops are severely compromised on the question of women's ordination. The hope of many Anglicans for a catholic resolution of this issue in the ACNA is further diminished. Perhaps Anglicans who hold to catholicity have hoped for the impossible. Consider whatArchbishop Foley
Beach said on this issue
in August 2014:
"...in our constitution and canons, we have left the issue of women's ordination for each diocese to decide. A lot of people came into the ACNA in good faith that their perspective -- including those who ordain women -- would be protected and guarded. And, people who believe in ordaining women hold their position by conscience and can Biblically argue it, although I disagree with them. This issue is a very important thing to them, and so I think it would create a lot of tension. A lot of the women priests in ACNA have stood side-by-side with a number of our bishops and clergy who are against women's ordination when they were in The Episcopal Church. These women argued for the right of these bishops to have the freedom to not ordain women. Women's ordination is a very complicated issue, because we've got people who have given their heart and soul on each side. And, these people are sincere; they're godly."
No doubt the Hobbys are fine, godly people, but they have set aside catholicity, an essential mark of the Church. That in itself should disqualify them from holding offices in the One Holy Catholic andApostolic Church .
Sometimes historical perspective is needed to see how we have strayed from the path set before the Church.
No woman ever served in the office of priest until 1944, at which time Florence Li Tim-Oi was ordained by Ronald Hall, Bishop of Victoria,Hong Kong , in response to the crisis among Anglicans in
Communist China. She later stepped down from serving as a priest.
In 1976 the Episcopal Church broke the age-old tradition of the all-male priesthood by vote of General Convention. At that time the "irregular" ordinations of the "Philadelphia Eleven" and the "Washington Four" were made regular. The first woman ordained to the priesthood in theUnited
States was Ellen Marie Barrett (January
1977). She was ordained by the Rt. Rev. Paul Moore, Jr., Bishop of New York.
Ellen Barrett, a lesbian, had served as Integrity's first co-president. Other
lesbians had been among the Philadelphia Eleven.
In theUnited
States , the ordination of women and gay and
lesbian "rights" were intertwined from the beginning, so that today
it is difficult to treat these as separate issues. Both have been framed as
equal rights issues, revealing a profound misrepresentation of the nature of
the priesthood, a distortion of Christology, and an abandonment of the Received
Tradition.
Such bishops are severely compromised on the question of women's ordination. The hope of many Anglicans for a catholic resolution of this issue in the ACNA is further diminished. Perhaps Anglicans who hold to catholicity have hoped for the impossible. Consider what
"...in our constitution and canons, we have left the issue of women's ordination for each diocese to decide. A lot of people came into the ACNA in good faith that their perspective -- including those who ordain women -- would be protected and guarded. And, people who believe in ordaining women hold their position by conscience and can Biblically argue it, although I disagree with them. This issue is a very important thing to them, and so I think it would create a lot of tension. A lot of the women priests in ACNA have stood side-by-side with a number of our bishops and clergy who are against women's ordination when they were in The Episcopal Church. These women argued for the right of these bishops to have the freedom to not ordain women. Women's ordination is a very complicated issue, because we've got people who have given their heart and soul on each side. And, these people are sincere; they're godly."
No doubt the Hobbys are fine, godly people, but they have set aside catholicity, an essential mark of the Church. That in itself should disqualify them from holding offices in the One Holy Catholic and
Sometimes historical perspective is needed to see how we have strayed from the path set before the Church.
No woman ever served in the office of priest until 1944, at which time Florence Li Tim-Oi was ordained by Ronald Hall, Bishop of Victoria,
In 1976 the Episcopal Church broke the age-old tradition of the all-male priesthood by vote of General Convention. At that time the "irregular" ordinations of the "Philadelphia Eleven" and the "Washington Four" were made regular. The first woman ordained to the priesthood in the
In the
This misrepresentation of the priest as a "right"
contributes to the Anglican identity crisis. Yet it is not the main factor. The
main factor is the ease with which the ACNA has set aside catholicity. Consider
this truth, spoken by Archbishop Mark Haverland: "We are not Anglicans
first and Catholics second. We are members of the One Holy Catholic and
Apostolic Church first, and Anglicans second."
In an address delivered to the ACNA in July 2015, Archbishop Haverland made this statement: "The central problem of which I just spoke is a lack of theological clarity and consistency and, to be blunt, catholicity."
The Body is broken because of willfulness of its members to innovate, accommodate to culture, and set aside the Received Tradition in favor of a subjective modernist approach to truth. In another, earlier context, Archbishop Haverland spoke of the Neo-Anglicans as being in "the slow lane to modernist mush."
What is this modernist mush? Fr Jay Scott Newman once described it as follows:
"The primary category mistake of most Anglicans seems to be a refusal to accept the Principle of Non-Contradiction. For example, either sodomy is a grave sin or the foundation of a sacrament, but it can't be both. Or, either it is possible that women have the capacity to receive presbyteral and episcopal ordination or they do not, but it can't be both. Let's forget for a moment the authority of Apostolic Tradition which every Catholic must believe is an intrinsic part of the Gospel (no sola Scriptura for us), when a foundational principle of right reason like Non-Contradiction is routinely denied in practice if not in theory, then the only thing left is raw will to power. Hence the General Convention of the Episcopal Church. Kyrie Eleison."
The continued embrace of women's ordination and the election of bishops who are married to women priests, represents the mushy thinking that allows for "dual integrities" -- an absurdity.
In an address delivered to the ACNA in July 2015, Archbishop Haverland made this statement: "The central problem of which I just spoke is a lack of theological clarity and consistency and, to be blunt, catholicity."
The Body is broken because of willfulness of its members to innovate, accommodate to culture, and set aside the Received Tradition in favor of a subjective modernist approach to truth. In another, earlier context, Archbishop Haverland spoke of the Neo-Anglicans as being in "the slow lane to modernist mush."
What is this modernist mush? Fr Jay Scott Newman once described it as follows:
"The primary category mistake of most Anglicans seems to be a refusal to accept the Principle of Non-Contradiction. For example, either sodomy is a grave sin or the foundation of a sacrament, but it can't be both. Or, either it is possible that women have the capacity to receive presbyteral and episcopal ordination or they do not, but it can't be both. Let's forget for a moment the authority of Apostolic Tradition which every Catholic must believe is an intrinsic part of the Gospel (no sola Scriptura for us), when a foundational principle of right reason like Non-Contradiction is routinely denied in practice if not in theory, then the only thing left is raw will to power. Hence the General Convention of the Episcopal Church. Kyrie Eleison."
The continued embrace of women's ordination and the election of bishops who are married to women priests, represents the mushy thinking that allows for "dual integrities" -- an absurdity.
It appears that the space for catholic Anglicans in the ACNA is
shrinking daily. Apparently, the welcome extended to people who came into the
ACNA in "good faith" that their perspective on women's ordination
would be protected and guarded has taken precedent over serious objections and
deep theological and biblical considerations. The catholic minded are
experiencing dejà vu and getting a picture of TEC redux.
Alice Linsley is a Biblical and Archeology scholar. She resides inKentucky .
Alice Linsley is a Biblical and Archeology scholar. She resides in
Friday, June 24, 2016
Saturday, June 18, 2016
Fourth Sunday after Trinity
Romans 8:18-23 * Luke 6:36-41
In his weekly Bulletin Inserts, Fr. Wells once told us about the two possible ways to translate part of today's Epistle:
"The opening verse contains an interesting translation problem. Is it the 'glory which shall be revealed in us' (as our AV and Prayer Book have it) or 'to us' (as many modern translations render it). It is attractive to think of the 'glory' mentioned here to be the wonderful moment when the returning Lord suddenly becomes visible in the skies as He returns to earth. The NT surely promises such an event of glory. But the larger context here, the futility of creation under the curse of thorns and thistles, the wrap-up of history with the redemption of our bodies in the General Resurrection, the believer's special status as 'first-fruits of the Spirit,' compels us to think the old translation is correct. We ourselves will be part of that glorious event when Christ comes again and shares His glory with us."
I agree with Fr. Wells. And, in order to make sense of both today's Epistle reading and of the selection from the Gospel according to St. Luke, we need to see that the glory to be revealed in us when Christ returns to raise us from the dead, will be the perfection of the life already implanted in us by grace. The grace of God has been at work in each of us from the moment of new birth, from the time of baptism.
Everything that the world, the flesh and the devil can throw at you, to overcome you and destroy you, has been thrown, is being thrown or will be thrown. Just as a person arrested by the police is warned, "anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law," you may be sure that anything the devil is allowed to throw at you can and will be thrown in the battlefield of your life. It is God who restrains evil so that you may withstand temptation, as St. Paul wrote:
"There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it." (I Cor. 10:13)
So, what may be thrown at us is limited to what God Himself allows. This does not mean, as some have paraphrased, "God won't give you more than you can handle." It means, instead, that God watches over each one of us, so that temptation to sin, as thrown at us, cannot be completely overwhelming. The picture that should come to mind is from the first two chapters of Job, where the devil has to ask God's permission as to what he may do to God's servant.
The fact is, God does indeed give us more than we can handle; for the Law of God is weak through the flesh; that is, the Law of God cannot make us good; the commandments themselves cannot transform us. The Scriptures reveal quite emphatically that we, in our weakened condition as sinners, cannot fully and perfectly obey God's commandments. No one ever has, except for one Man, Jesus Christ. You and I cannot make ourselves righteous, good or acceptable in His sight. Neither can we keep ourselves alive.
The kind of sufferings that St. Paul speaks of in today's Epistle surely include the kind that only sincere believers may experience. One chapter earlier he spoke of a special kind of suffering, that of the sincere believer who wants to be righteous:
"For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members." (Rom. 7:15-23)
This kind of suffering is of a nature that some individuals may never understand. It is, if we understand it, the grace of God at work. That may shock you to hear. Is not the grace of God always evident in happy feelings? Does not the grace of God make us "overcomers" and all that? Doesn't the man with real faith look like a perpetual smiley button?
To that I say, show me the person who never feels the pain of his sin, who never feels sorrow from knowledge of his own failure to please God, and I will show you someone in whom the grace of God is not evident at all. Such a person, who can go through life without the pain of conviction, the sense of need for God's forgiveness, a hunger and thirst for righteousness that eludes his own grasp, is in very grave danger. His heart is hardened, his conscience seered by a hot iron, his mind closed to the voice of the Holy Spirit urging repentance.
Such a person also is closed and indifferent to the needs of other people, and therefore is in danger of being one of the goats on the king's left hand, to Whom the Lord will say, in the Last day,
"Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not...Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me." (Matt. 25:31ff)
If you can hear the Summary of the Law, or the Ten Commandments, week after week, and not be moved to pray, "Lord have mercy upon us"-indeed, "upon me," then you may go through life without "the sufferings of this present time" as Paul experienced them within himself. But, if that seed is not planted within you, the grace of God that moves you to genuine repentance and to genuine love of neighbor as manifested in good works when opportunity arises, how can you hope to know the glory that will be revealed in the children of God? You may find yourself excluded from eternal joy.
Some people think it is a sin to feel any suffering. On the contrary, it is the worst condition of sin when the heart has become so hardened that it cannot suffer. That is, not suffer the reality of conviction and be moved to true repentance. St. Paul's own knowledge of his helpless condition was answered by faith in God's goodness as revealed and manifested already in Jesus Christ, giving him the absolute assurance of faith about eternity. And so he went on to say,
"O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin. There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." (Rom. 7:24-8:4)
To walk after the Spirit is described in our Book of Common Prayer as "hearty repentance and true faith." In modern English we would say "sincere repentance (or, from the heart) and true faith."
We look for the grace of God in this life, that fruit of the Spirit that shows His working in each of us. Our true hope, however, is not in this life, for this life will end for each one of us. If all we wanted or needed was simply "to be better people," as some perceive of a thing they call "religion," or to be "all that we can be" as the old U.S. Army advertisement put it, our lot would be one of utter futility. We would never be free from sin and death, even if we did become all that we can be.
Our hope is not in anything so fantastic or so shallow. This life will end in death. Even at its very lowest, the mortality rate is one hundred percent. Making sense of suffering, or pretending that there is no futility, or vanity as today's Epistle reading puts it, is not the Christian hope. It is not the Gospel. Our hope is in Jesus Christ our Lord. He has reconciled us to God, so that the pain of conscience is relieved only by knowing that on his cross He bore away forever the guilt and stain of our sin, and that in rising again on the third day He conquered death for each of us.
The joy of the Christian, in this vain and temporary life, is not that we have no suffering. In fact we have, in addition to the sufferings common to mankind such as, from time to time, loss, sickness, economic troubles and pain, added to the certainty of death, the added suffering of a conscience that feels even the briefest separation, that we make by our own sin, from God's fellowship. The joy of the Christian is that "in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us." (Rom. 8:37) The joy of the Christian is that our hope and faith depend not on ourselves, weak as we are through sin and death, but upon the Lord Jesus Christ who has come and who will come again in glory.
It is, as expressed in today's Epistle: "The sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us." For, as the same chapter concludes:
"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."
"The opening verse contains an interesting translation problem. Is it the 'glory which shall be revealed in us' (as our AV and Prayer Book have it) or 'to us' (as many modern translations render it). It is attractive to think of the 'glory' mentioned here to be the wonderful moment when the returning Lord suddenly becomes visible in the skies as He returns to earth. The NT surely promises such an event of glory. But the larger context here, the futility of creation under the curse of thorns and thistles, the wrap-up of history with the redemption of our bodies in the General Resurrection, the believer's special status as 'first-fruits of the Spirit,' compels us to think the old translation is correct. We ourselves will be part of that glorious event when Christ comes again and shares His glory with us."
I agree with Fr. Wells. And, in order to make sense of both today's Epistle reading and of the selection from the Gospel according to St. Luke, we need to see that the glory to be revealed in us when Christ returns to raise us from the dead, will be the perfection of the life already implanted in us by grace. The grace of God has been at work in each of us from the moment of new birth, from the time of baptism.
Everything that the world, the flesh and the devil can throw at you, to overcome you and destroy you, has been thrown, is being thrown or will be thrown. Just as a person arrested by the police is warned, "anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law," you may be sure that anything the devil is allowed to throw at you can and will be thrown in the battlefield of your life. It is God who restrains evil so that you may withstand temptation, as St. Paul wrote:
"There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it." (I Cor. 10:13)
So, what may be thrown at us is limited to what God Himself allows. This does not mean, as some have paraphrased, "God won't give you more than you can handle." It means, instead, that God watches over each one of us, so that temptation to sin, as thrown at us, cannot be completely overwhelming. The picture that should come to mind is from the first two chapters of Job, where the devil has to ask God's permission as to what he may do to God's servant.
The fact is, God does indeed give us more than we can handle; for the Law of God is weak through the flesh; that is, the Law of God cannot make us good; the commandments themselves cannot transform us. The Scriptures reveal quite emphatically that we, in our weakened condition as sinners, cannot fully and perfectly obey God's commandments. No one ever has, except for one Man, Jesus Christ. You and I cannot make ourselves righteous, good or acceptable in His sight. Neither can we keep ourselves alive.
The kind of sufferings that St. Paul speaks of in today's Epistle surely include the kind that only sincere believers may experience. One chapter earlier he spoke of a special kind of suffering, that of the sincere believer who wants to be righteous:
"For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members." (Rom. 7:15-23)
This kind of suffering is of a nature that some individuals may never understand. It is, if we understand it, the grace of God at work. That may shock you to hear. Is not the grace of God always evident in happy feelings? Does not the grace of God make us "overcomers" and all that? Doesn't the man with real faith look like a perpetual smiley button?
To that I say, show me the person who never feels the pain of his sin, who never feels sorrow from knowledge of his own failure to please God, and I will show you someone in whom the grace of God is not evident at all. Such a person, who can go through life without the pain of conviction, the sense of need for God's forgiveness, a hunger and thirst for righteousness that eludes his own grasp, is in very grave danger. His heart is hardened, his conscience seered by a hot iron, his mind closed to the voice of the Holy Spirit urging repentance.
Such a person also is closed and indifferent to the needs of other people, and therefore is in danger of being one of the goats on the king's left hand, to Whom the Lord will say, in the Last day,
"Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not...Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me." (Matt. 25:31ff)
If you can hear the Summary of the Law, or the Ten Commandments, week after week, and not be moved to pray, "Lord have mercy upon us"-indeed, "upon me," then you may go through life without "the sufferings of this present time" as Paul experienced them within himself. But, if that seed is not planted within you, the grace of God that moves you to genuine repentance and to genuine love of neighbor as manifested in good works when opportunity arises, how can you hope to know the glory that will be revealed in the children of God? You may find yourself excluded from eternal joy.
Some people think it is a sin to feel any suffering. On the contrary, it is the worst condition of sin when the heart has become so hardened that it cannot suffer. That is, not suffer the reality of conviction and be moved to true repentance. St. Paul's own knowledge of his helpless condition was answered by faith in God's goodness as revealed and manifested already in Jesus Christ, giving him the absolute assurance of faith about eternity. And so he went on to say,
"O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin. There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh: That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." (Rom. 7:24-8:4)
To walk after the Spirit is described in our Book of Common Prayer as "hearty repentance and true faith." In modern English we would say "sincere repentance (or, from the heart) and true faith."
We look for the grace of God in this life, that fruit of the Spirit that shows His working in each of us. Our true hope, however, is not in this life, for this life will end for each one of us. If all we wanted or needed was simply "to be better people," as some perceive of a thing they call "religion," or to be "all that we can be" as the old U.S. Army advertisement put it, our lot would be one of utter futility. We would never be free from sin and death, even if we did become all that we can be.
Our hope is not in anything so fantastic or so shallow. This life will end in death. Even at its very lowest, the mortality rate is one hundred percent. Making sense of suffering, or pretending that there is no futility, or vanity as today's Epistle reading puts it, is not the Christian hope. It is not the Gospel. Our hope is in Jesus Christ our Lord. He has reconciled us to God, so that the pain of conscience is relieved only by knowing that on his cross He bore away forever the guilt and stain of our sin, and that in rising again on the third day He conquered death for each of us.
The joy of the Christian, in this vain and temporary life, is not that we have no suffering. In fact we have, in addition to the sufferings common to mankind such as, from time to time, loss, sickness, economic troubles and pain, added to the certainty of death, the added suffering of a conscience that feels even the briefest separation, that we make by our own sin, from God's fellowship. The joy of the Christian is that "in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us." (Rom. 8:37) The joy of the Christian is that our hope and faith depend not on ourselves, weak as we are through sin and death, but upon the Lord Jesus Christ who has come and who will come again in glory.
It is, as expressed in today's Epistle: "The sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us." For, as the same chapter concludes:
"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."
Saturday, June 11, 2016
Friday, June 03, 2016
Thursday, June 02, 2016
Starvation in Sudan
This information was sent via email. Please do whatever you can.
Dear all,
More from South Sudan: here in Canada, having received the news from Bishop Garang that the famine situation was worse: some 200 or so members of the diocese severely affected by starvation, we were able to send CDN$400 to be collected at Western Union in Nairobi by his wife, Tabitha, who would make the transfer to Aweil, and the Bishop. When she arrived at Western Union, with her passport as ID, the clerk advised that the money had already been collected. So, now we have a claim with Western Union: they say it may take up to 10/12 weeks to resolve: but in the meanwhile, the people starve, and we do not have the funds to send more money right now: can you help? Paypal available at the website http://parishofstbride.webs.com/
In Christ,
David+
Friday, May 27, 2016
First Sunday after Trinity
I John 4:7-21 * Luke 16:19-31
The subject of faith and good works has been very
important throughout the history of the Church, and it was especially important
during the sixteenth century in the various forms taken by the Reformation. It
was no less a burning issue in England than anywhere else.
Nonetheless, most people tend to think of Martin Luther when the subject comes
up, and his alleged dislike of the Epistle of James.
In fact, Luther
did not call the Epistle of James an “epistle of straw” exactly. Rather he
wrote:
"St. John's Gospel and
his first Epistle, St. Paul's Epistles, especially those to the Romans,
Galatians, Ephesians, and St. Peter's Epistle-these are the books which show to
thee Christ, and teach everything that is necessary and blessed for thee to
know, even if you were never to see or hear any other book of doctrine.
Therefore, St. James' Epistle is a perfect straw-epistle compared with them,
for it has in it nothing of an evangelic kind." (Preface to
the New Testament)
That is, he thought it was of lesser importance.
Now, I do not
think we need dwell on that, for he was not suggesting that anyone should fail
to read all of Scripture. Nonetheless, to this day people contend that
between St. Paul and
St. James a great gulf is set in place, a barrier of disagreement too wide to
traverse. So, we need to read carefully the passages in question, always
remembering that the invisible hand that authored Scripture was Almighty God,
the Holy Spirit opening the eyes and minds of the several writers with the
revelation of God’s holy word. Therefore, no genuine contradiction can exist in
the doctrine of those writers.
Works
of the Law and works of faith
The most significant passages are the third chapter
of Paul’s Epistle to the Church in Rome ,
and the second chapter of James’ general Epistle. Let us begin with St. Paul .
“Now we know that what
things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every
mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. Therefore
by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by
the law is the knowledge of sin. But now the righteousness of God without the
law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; Even the
righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all
them that believe: for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come
short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the
redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a
propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the
remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I
say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier
of him which believeth in Jesus. Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By
what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that a
man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.” (Rom. 3:19-28)
In this passage St. Paul is
talking about works of the Law. Writing about our Article X, I said this, which
begins by quoting a part of the Article:
“’The condition of man after the fall of Adam is
such, that he cannot turn and prepare himself, by his own natural strength and
good works, to faith and calling upon God.’
“Is this telling us not to prepare ourselves, or not to do good works? Read
that way it can provide an excuse for laziness and disobedience to the
commandments of God. On the contrary, we would sin by not doing these things.
But, even our performance of them, were it the best we possibly could do, could
not make us righteous…
“It would all look completely hopeless if we did not have the second sentence
of this brief Article. ’Wherefore we have no power to do good works
pleasant and acceptable to God, without the grace of God by Christ preventing
us that we may have a good will, and working with us when we have that good
will.’
“There we see
that word, ‘grace.’ That is the whole difference. However good our good works
may be, God’s standard of ‘good’ is too high for even our best efforts.
Righteousness by His true and perfect standard exceeds our reach. We cannot
achieve it. That is not because His standard is unjust. In fact, it is because
His standard is just, in fact perfectly just. This is why
no one can understand the doctrine of grace unless and until he understands the
reality of human sin.”
It is, as Paul said, “by the law is the knowledge of sin.” That is, in
the work of the great Physician of souls, the Law is diagnostic. As St. Paul said to the Galatian Church ,
“Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring
us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.” (Gal. 3:24)
It all boils down
to the fact that justification is a gift given, not a reward earned. St. John tells us in
today’s Epistle, “Herein is love, not that we
loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for
our sins.” It would be hopeless
if not for the grace of God: “But of him
are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness,
and sanctification, and redemption.” (I Cor. 1:30)
So, when works of
the Law are good and commendable it is only by the grace of God in Christ. On
their own, works of the Law come up short, failing to meet God’s perfect
standard. Works of the Law do not justify. Such good works are not weighed
against sins to see which are heavier on the Day of Judgment. They are
commanded and must be done; but are not counted or weighed against sins in some
eternal ledger. Only the blood of Christ cancels out sin. The Law does not
justify, for that is not its purpose.
But, it appears
at first glance that James contradicts Paul.
“What doth it profit,
my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save
him? If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, And one of
you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye
give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?
Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. Yea, a man may say,
Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I
will shew thee my faith by my works.” (James 2:14-18)
After citing examples from the Old Testament
(Abraham & Rahab), James comes right out with the most direct line of all,
seeming to contradict Paul: “Ye see then how that by works a man is justified,
and not by faith only.” (v.24)
So, which is right? Is it Paul, who says, “a man is justified by faith without
the deeds of the law”? or James who says, “by works a man is justified, and not
by faith only.” Both men are right, both agree, for
both were inspired to write their doctrine by the Holy Spirit who guided them
in what to say.
Paul spoke of works of the
Law, and James spoke of works of faith. Paul explained
that the Law cannot make anyone righteous, but that only faith can justify; and
James explained that faith is evident by works. If we find a passage that sums
up what both men were saying, in full agreement, it from Paul’s Epistle to the
Church in Ephesus :
“For by grace are ye
saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of
works, lest any man should boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ
Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in
them.” (Eph. 2:8-10)
Paul, again to the Galatians: “For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth anything,
nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.” (Gal. 5:6) And, to the
Corinthians, “And now abideth faith, hope,
charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.” (I Cor.
13:13) “Faith without works is dead, being alone… For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is
dead also,” James tells us. This works well with Paul’s doctrine, that faith is
accompanied by love. James says that we show faith by our works, and Paul tells
us that faith "works by love.”
A true believer,
one who has faith in Christ, cannot live in that faith and not be changed by
it. The fact that “we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good
works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them,” as Paul
wrote, simply has to find expression in our lives. Where faith is, a person
having been justified already, can be transformed by the Holy Spirit in day to
day life.
Love of neighbor
The second great
commandment, “thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself,” comes with that
piercing diagnosis. It is the Law. It reveals to each heart its own
shortcomings and failure. But, God gives us more grace even still, to live as
John teaches us in today’s Epistle reading. We know that God loves us. How do
we know that God loves us? Because He gave His Son to be the Propitiation for
our sins. And, now we have been given a power to love God because He first
loved us. And, because we can love God, we have that power to love our brother
also.
The love that
springs from a life of true faith, due of course to the Holy Spirit (“The love
of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto
us.” Rom. 5:5),
makes good works inevitable and spontaneous. A true believer simply cannot ignore the needs he
encounters among people. Works of the Law count for nothing in terms of
justification; works of faith, however, are a pleasing fruit of that faith,
because that faith works by the love of God shed abroad in our hearts by the
Holy Ghost.
The rich man who
ignored the suffering of Lazarus, is lost, finally, because he did not hear the
word of God. “If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be
persuaded, though one rose from the dead.” Had he heard the word of God
and believed, could he have left Lazarus out there at his gate? Would not faith
have worked by love? If the goats at the King’s left hand (in Matt. 25: 31-46)
had the faith of those sheep at His right hand, could they have failed to do
for “one of the least of these” His brethren?
The First Sunday
after Trinity is very important for reasons I have said before.
“The Summary of
the Law with the Two Great Commandments summarizes the Ten Commandments; we
have two commandments and two tables. For, in the Ten Commandments we have the
first Table, with four commandments about loving God. Then we have the second
table, with six commandments about loving your neighbor.
“In the middle of
the Church Year we turn to the second table on this day. Up until now we have
concentrated on the commandments to love the Lord thy God; now we look at the
commandments that tell you, and me, how to ‘love thy
neighbor as thyself.’
“Where, in all of
that emphasis from Advent through Pentecost, do we concentrate on the
commandments that tell us how to love God? It seems that the opposite is true.
What we have seen is the proof that God loves us. Exactly so. This is
what St. John tells
us in the Epistle reading we have heard today: ‘We love him,
because he first loved us.’”
“And this
commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God love his brother also.”
Hunger in Aweil
The following is in the current issue of THE TRINITARIAN, and is posted here with
permission from the editor.
THE THIRD HORSEMAN UNLOOSED
By the Rt. Rev. Wilson Garang, Bishop of the Diocese of
Aweil, Anglican Catholic Church
A humanitarian catastrophe has overwhelmed the Diocese of
Aweil in South Sudan , of which I am the Bishop
Ordinary. People are not getting enough to eat, and many are dying. Recently, I
returned from a visitation to my diocese, during which I got a first-hand look
at the situation. I saw with my own eyes how desperate the situation is. It is
a horrific picture. People are collecting wild leaves because there is nothing
else for them to eat. Some have died falling from trees while trying to get
leaves. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) estimates
that some 38,000 people have crossed the border into North
Sudan in search of food. Many thousands more may follow if nothing
is done. Making things worse, unrest is growing in northwestern South Sudan , where my diocese is located.
Mostly Christian and animist South Sudan began its descent
into misery and chaos in late 2013, only five months after achieving
independence from overwhelmingly Muslim North Sudan . Since then, the situation
has gone from bad to worse. People continue to leave their homes, looking for
safety and, above all, food. A global food security body has placed the number
of people lacking adequate diet at 2.8 million out of a population of about 12
million. A recent news agency dispatch reports the arrival of nearly 6,000
South Sudanese refugees at two locations in North Sudan’s West Kordofan
State . And in East Darfur , an average of 500 South Sudanese — or about
100 households — have been arriving daily. Many more are expected in the days
and weeks to come. In addition, thousands of refugees, mostly children, have
fled to Uganda ,
the news agency reports. The UNHCR says most arrivals have traveled up to four
weeks before reaching their destination. They carry few personal belongings.
Most are in poor health, many having risked their lives along the way. They
need food, water and basic relief items, and they need help in reuniting with
other family members. The situation looks to get no better. But a solution is
hard to find. We all must pray for God’s help, and to make more people aware of
the disaster that is unfolding day by day. Dear friends in Christ, please pray
for the Diocese of Aweil and for its people. Pray for all South Sudanese. Pray
that they may get their daily bread. Pray for peace. Amen.
Thursday, May 26, 2016
From the archives
In light of expressed differences between the bulk of Continuing Anglicans and one jurisdiction, I post this link to a historical and theological article I wrote for this blog over six years ago.
Saturday, May 21, 2016
Trinity Sunday
Tomorrow I will also post an audio recording of a new sermon (God willing). In the meantime, here are two from the archives of this blog. The first one is about the doctrine celebrated on this Sunday, and the second is from the appointed Gospel reading, and speaks of the Kingdom of God.
THE REVELATION OF THE TRINITY AND SALVATION
TRINITY SUNDAY 2014 (THE KINGDOM OF GOD)
THE REVELATION OF THE TRINITY AND SALVATION
TRINITY SUNDAY 2014 (THE KINGDOM OF GOD)
Saturday, May 14, 2016
Pentecost
Commonly Called Whitsunday
Acts 2:1-11 * John 14:15-31
Who hath heard such a thing? who hath
seen such things? Shall the earth be made to bring forth in one day? or shall a
nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion
travailed, she brought forth her children.
(Isaiah
66:8)
We could say rightly that Zion 's
labor was brief, for, after only ten days of prayer, the Church came forth as a
nation born in a day. Christ, as touching his human body as Jesus of Nazareth,
had stepped behind the veil when a cloud took him out of their sight. Then, on
the Day of Pentecost, the infant Church was born in what we might rightly call
the second chapter of the Incarnation.
God the Word (λόγος)
came into the world on the Day of the Annunciation, and showed himself in his
Nativity when he was born in Bethlehem .
He walked the earth as a man, and "went about doing good, and healing all
that were oppressed of the devil." (Acts 10:38) On the Day of Pentecost,
the Church that waited so short a time, as they were together in prayer for ten
days, sprang forth to carry on the ministry of Jesus Christ. He still goes
about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil, this time
through the Church which is his Body. Make no mistake about it; when the Holy
Spirit was poured out on the disciples, the Church became the Body of Christ
just as truly as Christ had been born years earlier in Bethlehem .
Our ministry as the Church is His
ministry, as he extends his Incarnation through us, and goes about doing good
not only as far as one man may travel, but into every place on earth,
preaching the Gospel in all the world as a testimony to all nations, gathering
out of all nations those who are his disciples. The Church, his bride and his
Body, believes and does works greater in number, just as the disciple Elisha
did twice in number the miracles of Elijah the prophet, when a double portion
of the same Spirit rested on him. (II Kings 2:9f, John 14:12)
Among the many people in Jerusalem,
who had come for the feast of Pentecost, were pilgrims from various nations,
that is the God-fearers and proselytes who were born as Gentiles, and either
had begun to convert to Judaism, or had fully converted. Also, there many Jews
of the Diaspora who lived most of the time in foreign countries. Although just
about everyone in the Roman Empire spoke
enough Greek to get by, as it was the international language, these pilgrims
heard the disciples speaking in the languages of their own distant homelands.
Anyone with genuine experience of such things knows fully well that this was
not something uncontrollable, not the result of a trance or ecstasy, and certainly
not emotionalism; the speaking was subject fully to the self-control of each
one who spoke in these other tongues; but the words themselves were known only
to those foreigners who heard the word of God each in his own native tongue.
“Now when this was noised abroad, the
multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them
speak in his own language. And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one
to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilæans? And how hear we
every man in our own tongue, where in we were born? Parthians, and Medes, and
Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judæa, and Cappadocia, in Pontus , and Asia, Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt , and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene ,
and strangers of Rome .
Jews and proselytes, Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues
the wonderful works of God.”
What were these tongues (γλῶσσα, glōssa) that we read about? How did they serve as a sign for
unbelievers (I Cor. 14:22)? Why did God choose a thing that seemed so weak and
foolish that onlookers expressed derision? "Others mocking said, These men
are full of new wine." The Scripture goes on to say, "But Peter,
standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and said unto them, Ye men of
Judaea, and all ye that dwell at Jerusalem, be this known unto you, and hearken
to my words: For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the
third hour of the day." (Acts 2: 13-15) The many disciples spoke mysteries
to God (I Cor. 14:2), understood by none of the local men. But to those who
heard the truth spoken in their own tongues, by men who never learned to
speak them, but were simply given utterance of praise and thanksgiving
for "the wonderful works of God," this was not a thing to be treated
with contempt, but with fear. It was a sign. The division of mankind into
different nations through the confusion of tongues at Babel , was a curse that was undone within the
Church. In Christ we are one Body, gathered by one Spirit from the four corners
of the earth.
“And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation; And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.” (Rev. 5:9,10)
Peter had no trouble identifying what had happened, and doing so from Scripture:
“But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel; And it shall come to
pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh:
and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see
visions, and your old men shall dream dreams: And on my servants and on my
handmaidens I will pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall
prophesy.” (Acts 2:16-18 quoting Joel 2:28)
Peter had changed. He had been a
natural man (ψυχικός psychikos-soulish) unable earlier in his life
to understand why the Christ, the Son of the Living God, was ready and willing
to take up the cross; later he was afraid and denied the Lord three times. But,
now he stands on his feet boldly, not afraid of death, having his mind focused
on the truth, able to understand and know from Scripture everything that had
unfolded and was unfolding. He had been a disciple for more than three years,
but now was closer to Christ than at any time when he beheld him with the eyes;
for he was now part of the Body of which Christ is the Head. Many a time Peter
had stumbled and tripped over his own tongue; and he had failed to speak the
right words on the night in which his Lord was betrayed. But, now he spoke with
more clarity, more power and more authority than any prophet of the Old
Covenant. He delivered the first Christian sermon, as he was now the fisher of
men Christ had foreseen; his dragnet of words brought in about three thousand
souls. The young Church thrived with healthy vital signs.
None of this was man-made. The best
efforts of organization could not have produced it; the most detailed planning
could not have pulled it off. No human effort could have brought it forth in a
day, because the nation born on the Day of Pentecost was chapter two of the
Word made flesh. The Body of Christ now came into the world.
What is the life of the Church? It is
the Holy Spirit present within us. What is the strength of the Church? It is
the power (δύναμις) of God by his Holy Spirit,
present within us. Who is it that takes fallible and failed human beings, lifts
them up from the ground and sets them on their feet? It is the Holy Spirit
present within us. Who is is that puts his word of eloquence and power on their
formerly unclean lips? It is the Holy Spirit present within us. Who is it that
fulfills his own purpose and will with flawed human instruments? It is the Holy
Spirit present within us. Who makes Christ known among all nations of the earth
to people of every race and tongue? It is the Holy Spirit present within us.
Who has unlimited power, and works most effectively through us after we
have come to the end of our own strength, and can go no further? It is the Holy
Spirit present within us.
We know from the end of the Gospel of
Luke that the disciples were forbidden to take this work on themselves
prematurely, as if it depended simply on human power and wisdom.
“Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,
And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer,
and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of
sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
And ye are witnesses of these things. And, behold, I send the promise of my
Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem , until ye be endued with power from
on high.” (Luke 24:45-49)
Frankly, in light of the
foolishness of sinful men, it is very obvious that God's power and grace have
never depended on anyone less than God himself. Never think that we, as the
Church, have succeeded in representing God and spreading his kingdom by our own
human cleverness, or our best laid plans, or our own strength. We have an
organized structure, but the permanent shape of that structure was revealed and
enacted by the Holy Spirit. The whole life of the Church is charismatic
(χάρισμα); from the receiving of Scripture to the
Sacraments, from the Apostolic Succession to the faithful service of each
member.
Indeed, St. Paul, speaking in the
context of spiritual gifts, even goes as far as to call the Church by the name
of Christ himself: "For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all
the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ...Now
ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular." (I Cor, 12:12, 27)
So, I have not spoken carelessly in saying that the Church is part two of the
Incarnation. The Jesus who goes about now doing good and healing is none other
than the Body of Christ and members in particular. He does his work through
you, through his Body the Church, by the Holy Spirit, the other Comforter who
is with us and in us.
The day of Pentecost was a feast in
the Law of Moses when the first sheaf of the harvest was waved before the Lord.
It was also the same day that the Lord had descended on Mount Sinai, when the
whole nation of Israel
heard the voice of God as he spoke his ten commandments. Therefore, it is quite
fitting that the Lord Jesus foretold the outpouring of the Spirit in terms of
his commandments. "If ye love me, keep my commandments. And I will pray
the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you
for ever; even the Spirit of truth." Therefore, if we remain faithful to
him, we continue to take part in his Incarnation as the Church, the Body of
Christ. For his Spirit not only comes upon us, but abides within us always.
Monday, May 09, 2016
Wednesday, May 04, 2016
Saturday, April 30, 2016
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
Surgical Fantasy
My newest article in Touchstone has been posted online.
Read more:http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=29-03-025-v#ixzz46J8oKzNh
Surgical Fantasy
Robert Hart on Biblical Compassion for Sex-Change Confusion
God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. (1 Cor. 14:33)
The invention of a new "civil right" is being forced upon us. I believe that if the great martyr of genuine civil rights could see what is being done in the name of his cause, he would be displeased—that is, if the things he actually believed in his lifetime are taken into account.
Read more:http://www.touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=29-03-025-v#ixzz46J8oKzNh
Labels:
Moral Theology,
Sacraments
Friday, April 15, 2016
Saturday, April 09, 2016
SECOND SUNDAY AFTER EASTER
II Peter 2:19-25 * John 10:11-16
The Epistle we read today is drawn, as I hope many of you have noticed, from that very famous Suffering Servant passage in the book of Isaiah, specifically chapters 52:13-53:12. I have said before that the Suffering Servant passage goes beyond Christ’s atoning death, predicting as well his resurrection by telling us that he would, after death, “prolong his days” as the agent of God’s will. It predicts the day of Pentecost by telling us that Christ would “divide the spoil with the strong.” This echoes words from Psalm 68: 18: “Thou hast ascended on high, thou hast led captivity captive: thou hast received gifts for men.” But, as the chapter draws to a close, the prophet takes us back to the cross, because that was the main thrust of this particular passage. In this way the Holy Spirit reminds us, through the prophetic oracle, that all of the grace, and, indeed every gift, that God gives to us has come by way of the cross of Christ. St. Anselm taught that Christ did all the work, and after earning a great reward for his labor, gives all of the benefits of his work away. He gives all of the earning, profit and reward to us. For, he is God the Son, and has need of nothing.
The emphasis of that passage is what Jesus did for us, and very importantly, what he did as the One for the Many. And, I can think of no better summary of that prophetic passage about the sacrifice Jesus offered of his own life, than the words of St. Paul from the fifth chapter of Romans:
"For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ. Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous."
So, we get that message, that Jesus died for our sins just as scripture foretold. St. Peter puts it to us with great force: “who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree.” That’s the first message. Christ offered himself as the Lover of mankind, in fact, as the one who loves you. He is the sacrifice not just for the whole world, but for you; dying as much for each as for all. This is why I tell you so often; when you look up at the crucifix where he pours out his soul unto death, and you see his love there, take it personally.
When we prayed the Collect today, we asked for understanding and for grace to see in his death two very important things that go together. This is what we prayed: “Almighty God, who hast given thine only Son to be unto us both a sacrifice for sin, and also an ensample of godly life; Give us grace that we may always most thankfully receive that his inestimable benefit, and also daily endeavor ourselves to follow the blessed steps of his most holy life; through the same, thy Son Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.” This Collect is drawn from the Epistle we read.
"For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth: who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not: but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously: who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed. For ye were as sheep going astray: but are now returned unto the Shepherd and Bishop of your souls."
This follows an exhortation to be patient when suffering wrongfully. “If, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable with God.” Peter tells us that when we follow Christ our Lord, we may expect to find the cross awaiting us. When we find it, and find no way around it, we may embrace it as the will of God, just as Jesus did.
The Lord spoke clearly of the difference between a true shepherd and a mere hireling, “whose own the sheep are not.” The Church has had its fill of hirelings. We know that the Church must tend to business in this world. Indeed, every family must conduct business. We all must have a place to live, food on the table, and utilities. So, the Church, like every family, must engage in a certain amount of practical business. Jesus sent his disciples to buy the things needed for the Passover; every family must conduct these practical matters of business.
But, though the Church must take care of a certain amount of necessary practical matters of business, the Church is not a business. We are not here to earn a profit (and thank God, because we would be failures if we had to be judged by the criteria of the marketplace). And, the work of the clergy is to serve as shepherds, and so carry on the work of Jesus himself. It is to care for God’s people, not to devour them, and not to abandon them in the face of danger, like the hireling who sees the wolf coming, and flees.
Some men receive Holy Orders and become hirelings; and, if they are not hirelings for money, they may be hirelings for something else. I see, sometimes, young men who imagine that the priesthood will give them status and prestige. They love the title, they love the vestments, and, they remind me all too often of the words of Jesus, about the Pharisees who loved greetings in the marketplaces, and to be called of men, Rabbi. 1 Well, if they stick long enough, they find the cross that they cannot get around. That is when they find out if they were ordained for the right reason.
Look at the closing words of today’s Gospel: “And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one flock, and one shepherd.” I have no doubt that this speaks mainly about the inclusion of the Gentiles, the grafting in of non-Jews to the cultivated olive tree of Israel. These words only started to be fulfilled when St. Peter went to the House of Cornelius to see Pentecost repeated and the Holy Spirit poured out on Gentiles. It is also right for us to see that, even today, there remain yet other sheep, not of this fold, who need to be brought in. The work is far from over, and each of you may have a share of that work. Because “you are the Body of Christ and members in particular 2,” each endowed with special gifts for ministry by the Holy Spirit, you are called to share the work of bringing those other sheep in. And, that is a win-win proposition. It is good for the parish, and good for them, indeed, a lifeline sent out to them.
If we are to work in God’s field with all the mess sheep bring, and the dangers presented by the wolf, we need not worry about finding the cross. It always finds us if we are faithful to Christ. It will be there; that I can promise each of you. The cross, in some form or other, is all that the fallen sinful world has for true servants of Jesus Christ. Not honor, respect or esteem; the cross. So, you don’t need to go looking for the cross, because the world is quite aggressive in providing it. Like the Son of God, who endured the cross, and thought nothing of the shame of the cross, for the joy set before him3, may each of you have grace to endure, to hope, and to follow in his footsteps. The suffering is but for a moment; the joy is eternal.
On his cross, the Good shepherd died for us; and by his cross he showed to us how to follow him on the path of life.
1. Matt. 23:7
2. I Cor. 12:27
3. Heb. 12:2
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










