A PLACE WHERE THOSE WHO LIVE IN THE ANGLICAN CONTINUUM, OR WHO ARE THINKING OF MOVING THERE, MIGHT SHARE IN ROBUST, IF POLITE, DISCUSSION OF MATTERS THEOLOGICAL AND ECCLESIOLOGICAL. QUOD UBIQUE, QUOD SEMPER, QUOD AB OMNIBUS CREDITUM EST
Friday, September 27, 2013
Saturday, September 21, 2013
Seventeenth Sunday after Trinity
Ephesians 4:1-6 * Luke 14:1-11
The Scriptures appointed for this day are about humbling ourselves, the active
rather than passive choice of humility as a way of life. It was humility to which
Jesus referred when He said that we cannot even enter the kingdom of God
unless we become as little children. As St.
Matthew recorded it, here is what happened and what the Lord said:
“At the same time came the disciples unto
Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven? And Jesus
called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them, And
said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little
children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever
therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in
the kingdom of heaven. And whoso shall receive one such little child in
my name receiveth me (Matt. 18:1-5).”
People today
love to use the word "spiritual” as a substitute for genuine religion that
makes moral demands. Saint Paul
uses the word “spiritual” to mean overcoming the temptations of the world, the
flesh and the Devil by walking in the Holy Spirit. The most practical thing we
see in today’s Gospel and Epistle is that humility is essential for those who
want to be spiritual. Also, since humility is necessary in order to be
spiritual (as Saint Paul
uses that word), it is also the key to peace among believers. Not only that,
but it is the key to remaining orthodox. It is the element of character that we
must have in order to bend our ears to hear, to be able to learn. For, the
Christian must be someone who, as G.K. Chesterton observed, knows that there is
in the earth something smarter than himself; and that something is the Church.
Frankly, if we ever think that we are smarter than the Church, we will be lost.
The Hebrew word for hear, and for obey, is the same word: That word is Sh’mai. It takes humility
to hear, and it takes humility to obey.
Long ago in a sermon I told you that I would not feed you my own stupid ideas,
but only the word of God. You see, the word “heresy” comes from a root that
means “opinion.” Yes, the word “heresy” carries the ideas of false doctrine and
of church division. Yet, all of that destructive power, unleashed by a terrible
combination of carnal and demonic motivation, comes from the exaltation of one’s
own opinion above the revealed truth of Scripture as known by the Church’s
Tradition- in fact, its infallible Tradition, built upon the Rock of revelation
that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God. Against that Tradition of
revealed truth, you and I can choose our own ideas. But, when we do that, it is
pride, both in its base carnality and in demonic motivation. Pride welcomes the
spirit of error into the heart and mind. "The works of the flesh" are
not only sexual lusts, but also many other things. Even political sins, which
include the use of manipulation - even within the Church - are included in
Paul's list of "the works of the flesh." Pride is one of those “works
of the flesh” that wars against the spirit and the knowledge of God. It desires
glory to be given to oneself. It desires power and prestige, position and
honor. But, in order to hear and obey God we must be humble. We must take up
the cross and follow Jesus Christ.
So, humility is also the key to peace among believers, to peace in the Church.
Divisions are not always caused by false doctrines. Many times they are caused
by strong and imposing personalities, by uncharitable deeds and words, by
politics and gossip. All of these things are works of the flesh, and they are
also tools of demons and the lure of the world. When they find their way into
the Church, it is, more often than not, due to pride. The words we have read
today tell us why we must strive to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of
peace. It is because “There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called
in one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism, One God and
Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all.” The Church
is one Body with one doctrine and one God. There is only one Body of Christ and
One Holy Spirit.
When Christ prayed that “they all might be one” this was one Person of the
Trinity speaking to another Person of the Trinity. The Son asked it, not of us,
but of the Father. And, as Saint Paul ’s
words tell us, there is only one Church. But, just as a man and wife are one
flesh, and are made one flesh by God Himself, it is no guarantee that they will
have the love and humility it takes to get along with each other. Where pride
motivates us to seek our own satisfaction in life, love is cast aside. Indeed, whole
sects have been built because of doctrinal errors due to the very thing I have
mentioned, the exaltation of opinion over the faith that was revealed once for
all to the saints. And, we cannot pretend that these things do not matter. But,
in addition to the problem of bad theology, we must avoid those other things
that divide the Church; politics, gossip, ambition and so forth.
Look at where we came from. Most of us awoke one day to the terrible fact that
the official Episcopal Church- the one headquartered in New York- had left us behind. We had not
left it; it had left us. It was all because of that terrible combination of
carnality and demonic motivation. Because of pride, that very first sin of the
Devil that caused his fall, many of the leaders of that once solid
denomination, that for many years had upheld the best of the Catholic Tradition
and the best of the English Reformation, began teaching their own ideas in an
attempt to be chique’,
and to be acceptable to a fallen world that hates God. Doctrine became more a
matter of being fashionable than of being true and faithful. Many of us held
out until we saw that it was a waste of time. For me, the truth hit hard when I
came to see that any person that I might evangelize into the faith of Christ, I
could not, in good conscience, bring into my own church. Not even the Parish I
was in; yes, it was still fighting the good fight (or trying to). But,
ultimately, it could not win because of the power of apostate bishops. Our life
in the Church should be one of a positive mission to the world around us, not
of a negative drain on our energy due to a constant battle against prelates and
General Conventions. How could I, in good conscience, bring anyone into that?
But, now we have found that, by God’s grace, our faith still lives just as it
was taught to us from the beginning; that others can keep the endowments, the
real estate and the social position that came with being Episcopalians. We will
keep the faith, thank you.
But, let us take heed that we learn a few lessons in light of the scriptures we
have read this day. I suggest that we must unlearn some bad lessons that we
learned from being in a constant battle (that is, for those of us who were
struggling for orthodoxy in the Episcopal Church, before realizing the futility
of wasting our allotted time in this world). The first lesson to unlearn is
about the whole idea of what a diocese is. In our old days, a diocese was
simply a legal entity which gave us a legitimate existence as a local church,
and it became for many of us a necessary evil. The reason is obvious. Bishops
were the enemy. More often than not, we just did not trust them. As C.S. Lewis
said about the clergy and the laity, in the Middle Ages the laity were sure the
priests were more orthodox than themselves. But now, they are sure that they
are more orthodox than the priests. Well, that applied double for bishops.
But, if we go back to the Bible we see Apostolic ministry as a gift that was
appointed by God, the extension in this world of Christ’s own ministry. If we
look at Saint Paul ’s
epistles to Timothy and to Titus, we see that he had laid his hands upon both
of those men in order to make them into shepherds of the flock, and to be his
successors in the apostolic college with the authority to ordain men for the
priestly ministry. The apostolic succession is in scripture, described rather
than explained, but clearly in scripture nonetheless. And, we can read about
the ministry of the bishops in great detail, in epistles to various churches,
by Saint Ignatius of Antioch ,
who wrote in the very early years of the Church.
I remember a very unfortunate and inaccurate TV presentation about Church
History in which some scholar, a woman from a University somewhere (oh my, it
was Elaine Pagels), was theorizing that Ignatius wrote his epistles in order to
add to his own power as a bishop. The truth is, however, that he wrote them
after being sentenced to death while on his way to Rome in chains to die in an
arena, expecting to be killed within a very short period of time; so I am not
sure how his teaching on the subject of the epscopacy, that is the office of
bishop, was supposed to increase his power. These letters were his legacy,
given to the whole Church out of love. He tells us in those letters that where
the bishop is present, there is Christ; and where Christ is present there is
the Catholic Church. We need bishops for that reason. That is why we belong to
a diocese. It is so we can belong to the Church, and so we can have valid
sacraments. The apostolic succession is more than a legal matter of canons, and
more than a relay race. It is the continuation of Apostolic ministry; it is not
a necessary evil. It is a blessing.
If you want to see chaos it is easy to find. You can find crazy doctrines and
personality cults tearing apart churches all around us. We need to be humble if
we want to avoid those things; that is, we need the humility of which St. Paul wrote in the
Epistle read today.
Of course, the great example of humility is that of Christ Himself. While
always being equal to God, He took human nature into his Person, and humbled
Himself to be, as the scripture says, obedient unto death, even the death of
the cross. He had, as a Man, always an ear to hear the Father’s will. So, He
humbled Himself as a servant and took away the sin of the world, and was
exalted after His resurrection, revealed to be the Lord of all heaven and
earth. That is the most astonishing thing. God the Son had an ear to hear.
Humility was good enough for God. How can it be less so for us?
Saturday, September 14, 2013
Sixteenth Sunday after Trinity
I hope everyone will understand if I post a link to sermon from 2010.
SIXTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY
SIXTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY
My father, Robert W. Hart Sr., died on Friday morning at the age of 87.
REMEMBER thy servant, O Lord, according to the favour which thou bearest unto thy people, and grant that, increasing in knowledge and love of thee, he may go from strength to strength, in the life of perfect service, in thy heavenly kingdom; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Ghost, ever, one God, world without end. Amen.
REMEMBER thy servant, O Lord, according to the favour which thou bearest unto thy people, and grant that, increasing in knowledge and love of thee, he may go from strength to strength, in the life of perfect service, in thy heavenly kingdom; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Ghost, ever, one God, world without end. Amen.
Thursday, September 05, 2013
Fifteenth Sunday after Trinity
Gal. 6:11-18 * Matt. 6:24f
Study
of Scripture on the Epistle
Gal. 6:11-18
It may well be that Saint Paul ’s words in this
Sunday’s portion of his Epistle to the churches of Galatia , sound a bit strange. All
of this talk about circumcision contrasted against the cross of our Lord Jesus
Christ, and people “glorying”- that is, in modern English, boasting- about the
“flesh” of these Christians, may well confuse a new Bible reader. It can lead
to mistaken ideas. The first mistaken idea is that whatever Saint Paul was talking about cannot be
relevant to modern people. The second mistaken idea is that this provides a
basis for an anti-Semitic interpretation of scripture. Another mistaken idea
would be we have no need for the authority and teaching of the Church.
In fact, let me deal with this third mistake. In so doing, I will have already
answered the others. Since we speak in the Creeds of the Catholic Church and of
the Catholic Faith, which we believe, we are stuck with the Catholic
Tradition- and thank God we are. The Nicene (/Constantinopolitan) Creed
says, “I believe One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church .”
Yes, we do believe in the Church, because Christ Himself founded it and is its
Head. But, in this great Creed you say I believe the Church; I believe what it
teaches.
The scripture, without solid teaching of what it means, can be taken captive by
any kook, fraud or con-man. So, when we speak of the Catholic Tradition we must
go back to the ancient times, those early centuries when the Church was under
persecution, or just emerging from persecution. We are saying that we believe
what Christ promised, namely that the Spirit of Truth would guide the Apostles
into all truth (John 16:13). And, as that promise of Christ applies to this
passage from Galatians, the young Church first had to deal with a heresy that
came about so early in its history that we see it addressed by St. Paul . When the apostles and elders
gathered in Jerusalem ,
they also, with complete unanimity, addressed and refuted it (Acts chapter
fifteen). This ancient heresy taught that, in order to be saved, a Gentile who
converts to Christianity must be circumcised and live by all of the 613
commandments of the Law of Moses.
Trendy writers have sold the idea that some controversy raged over what to do
with Gentiles converts. They sell the notion that this alleged controversy
raged for years, even among the Apostles, pitting Paul against James, and maybe
against Peter. They insist that we may infer, from this invented story of
theirs, that important questions can go unresolved and debated within the
Church for extended years before the Spirit leads us to a right conclusion.
They use their false and contrived reading of the New Testament to justify new
and outrageous ideas (including women's ordination and same sex blessings,
etc.).
But, that tale of a raging and prolonged controversy is pure fiction; and so,
like the future, it can teach us no lessons. What we really see in the New
Testament is that the Proto-Council in Jerusalem
was unanimous in its conclusion, without disagreement among the Apostles and
the Elders. At the Council they unanimously affirmed the earlier decision
recorded in the eleventh chapter of Acts, when they all agreed with Saint Peter
that he had been right to baptize the new Gentile converts without circumcising
them; because when the Holy Spirit came upon the Gentiles, gathered that day in
the house of Cornelius, God made no distinction between Jew and Gentile. The
immediate and unanimous Apostolic conclusion had been, at that time, “then hath
God granted the Gentiles repentance unto life (Acts 11;18).” So, when a new teaching
– a heresy- arose, as Gentile Christians were troubled by unauthorized teachers
who wanted them to be circumcised and to keep the Law, Saint Paul was in
complete agreement with Saint James, and with Saint Peter, and with all the
Apostles, that the Tradition of the Church (new as that Tradition was, but
established nonetheless) had to be defended. What Saint Peter had learned years
before when Gentiles first converted to Christ, and what his fellow Apostles
affirmed without argument (if you simply read the record in the Book of Acts),
was the very same teaching proclaimed by Saint Paul, and the same teaching that
the Council in Jerusalem upheld for all of the churches everywhere. In short,
the New Testament does not show a controversy among the Apostles, but rather
that they were in complete unity, agreeing among themselves concerning what it
was that the Holy Spirit had revealed. And so, in the New Testament we see the
Church teaching the content of Apostolic witness.
What does this mean for you? It means that what the Church has always taught
since its earliest days, as recorded in Scripture, is to be believed. In this
case, believe and know that you cannot save yourself by your own power. That
first heresy, that we are saved by circumcision (of the males) and by keeping
the 613 commandments, suggests that we have the power to save ourselves without
God’s help--that we can pull ourselves up to Heaven by our own bootstraps. A
few centuries later, this same idea would reappear in another form from Britain ’s very
own heretic, a fellow named Pelagius. Pelagius taught that we can, without
God’s grace, live holy lives simply by our own will power; that Christ came
merely to be our example. The man who worked hardest to refute the heresy of
Pelagianism was Saint Augustine .
He picked up the teaching of the Apostles back in the first Century, that we
cannot save ourselves by our own power; that we need the grace of God.
Today we can speak of the heresies of the Judaizers and of the Pelagians with
ease. But, think of what it meant for people back then to hear such teaching.
What if Christ had come only to be the example of perfection? Would not we be
without hope? We should all know about the problem of sin and death. What I
know about sin I did not need to learn in Seminary. I had the subject pretty
well mastered without reading a text book on it. Death is the flip side, a part
of the problem of sin; sin and death are two sides of one coin. One thing I do
not need is a perfect example to make the sting of my condemnation worse. I
need a Savior, both to rescue me from the reality of guilt (whether I have the
good sense to feel guilt, or not), and to heal my fallen soul of its
waywardness. Jesus the Good Example cannot save me; Jesus Christ, the Word made
flesh, the Lord and Savior Who is One with the Father, forever God even as He
takes into His own Person our human nature and redeems it, and by grace
perfects it, can and does save me. And, no one else can; certainly I cannot
save myself. In Christ, however, no longer am I bound for destruction, for an
eternity of death without God. Rather, forgiveness is extended, along with
grace and power by the Holy Spirit to be transformed, right up until that day
when we are made partakers of the Divine Nature (II Pet. 1:4) because the One
Who as God was made man, gives us even this very grace.
So, I trust you see that Saint Paul ’s
words are very relevant to you.
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Fourteenth Sunday after Trinity
The Epistle.
Gal. 5:16-24 * The Gospel. St. Luke 17:11-19
Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not
fulfill the lust of the flesh.
The key to understanding the Epistle
reading appointed for this Sunday is to know the Holy Spirit for Who He is. It is not enough to
know about the Holy Spirit in terms of Trinitarian theology, that he proceeds
from the Father, that He is one with the Father and the Son, "Who with the
Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified." We may know all
that, and be able to say all the right things about the Holy Spirit. But,
unless we know that He works among us and in us, and unless we learn to
recognize His work, He remains a stranger. His is a Mysterious Presence, but
His indwelling ought to be a known and discerned Presence.
It would be easy today to zero in on the "works of the flesh," and to
preach against various sins. Now, it is right to preach against those things
that St. Paul
lists, but only if we do so keeping in mind that he prescribes the cure before
detailing his diagnosis. We should know that all of the things St. Paul lists
are sinful, and that the consequences of living with those things willfully is
dangerous indeed; as he wrote: "They which do such things shall not
inherit the kingdom of God."
It is not fashionable to preach about Hell or even to mention it. It is fashionable in modern religion to make the Church safe for warm fuzzies, for feel good religion. It is not fashionable even to mention death in church anymore. Is that not ironic? The one context in which we learn how to face death without fear, church, has become a venue in which we are supposed to avoid all mention of death. That time will come, when there will be no death, for Christ shall have come again. But, if we are to arrive safely at that destination, risen with Christ in glory to die no more, we need to prepare.
It is not fashionable to preach about Hell or even to mention it. It is fashionable in modern religion to make the Church safe for warm fuzzies, for feel good religion. It is not fashionable even to mention death in church anymore. Is that not ironic? The one context in which we learn how to face death without fear, church, has become a venue in which we are supposed to avoid all mention of death. That time will come, when there will be no death, for Christ shall have come again. But, if we are to arrive safely at that destination, risen with Christ in glory to die no more, we need to prepare.
Sin and death are the sickness of the human race. This list that Paul gives us,
that he calls "the works of the flesh," is merely a list of symptoms.
Nonetheless, a real problem today is that some people cannot recognize the
symptoms for what they are. For example, "Adultery, fornication,
uncleanness, lasciviousness" are on the list. But, in some churches, no
one has even taught the children, as they begin to mature, that everyone is
commanded by God to wait until marriage. Television, movies, and the mores
of our popular culture all seem finely tuned to teach your children to accept a
standard of sexual conduct that is, frankly, sinful and forbidden. I don't care
if "wait until marriage" seems quaint and outdated or not. You are
required to teach it to your children, and to live by it. We don't get to make
the rules, and we are forbidden to change them. It is God who has commanded us
to obey His Law, and He never changes. Fornication is still a sin, and it will
be a sin in the future too. Some things do not change, especially the
commandments of God.
Hatred and wrath are also on the list. Indeed, the Epistle reading we heard
today is followed by these words, as the last two verses of the chapter:
"If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit. Let us not be
desirous of vain glory, provoking one another, envying one another." And,
there is more on the list, including such things as heresies and witchcraft- by
which the King James translators meant occult practices (seances, fortune
telling, and other forbidden practices, that I hope no one here dabbles in. The
danger in those things includes demonic possession).
Here too we see the need for the remedy. We are told to avoid all these sinful
things. But never forget, this comes to us in a larger context, one that begins
by telling us that the solution is to walk in the Spirit. The larger context
tells us more than not to hate or envy. It tells us to love one another,
something positive, and that is more dynamic and radical than merely not
hating. The whole context, remember, speaks of this remedy coming from the Holy
Spirit.
If we really want to understand the meaning of today's Epistle reading, we need
to see the contrast between "the works of the flesh" and "the
fruit of the Spirit." St. Paul
is not merely preaching against giving in to sin. He is providing the solution
to the problem, and telling us more: How to advance into our calling to be holy
people, that is, saints. And, he seems to be saying that we are stuck
between two opposing forces: The Holy Spirit and the flesh.
When St. Paul uses the word "flesh,"
he takes his meaning from the words of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane .
“Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death:
tarry ye here, and watch with me. And he went a little further, and fell on his
face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass
from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt. And he cometh unto the
disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not
watch with me one hour? Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the
spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak. (Matt. 26:38-41)”
It seems a simple task. Jesus told them to watch, to stay awake during His time
of agony and prayer. They intended to watch and pray, but fell asleep because
of the weakness of the flesh. "The spirit indeed is willing (in this
case He means the human spirit), but the flesh is weak." How is the
flesh weak? It seems, rather, to be quite strong. At times, it seems to have a
power that grips and imprisons the human will. It seems strong indeed when
someone finds it next to impossible to resist the flesh if certain properties
are set in motion, such as lust, jealousy or rage.
Whether we think the flesh is strong or weak depends on what we intend to do.
The disciples intended to do the right thing, that is, to stay awake, to watch
with their Lord. But, they were overcome, and that is because the flesh had no
power to resist exhaustion. And, that is what happens if we think we can rely
on merely human power to become the holy people we are called to become. We
find that the flesh, the stuff of which we are made, fails. It has no strength
to do anything except to seek gratification and survival. That is the result of
having a nature that is fallen. The flesh, this stuff of which we are
made that is mortal and subject to death during this time of sojourn in the
wilderness, does not possess the supernatural grace of God.
Therefore, though we constrain ourselves and act like civilized people, and
exert a measure of self-control, we are still faced with that weakness that
cannot rise to the ever present occasion of God's commandments, as they are
summed up in the two greatest commandments of the Law. How can I love God? How
can I love my neighbor? Where does the necessary power come from?
"But
the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness,
goodness, faith, meekness, temperance: against such there is no law."
What is that? The list of sinful symptoms are "the works of the
flesh," and the list of godly virtues are "the fruit of the
Spirit." We need to understand the contrast between the flesh and the
Spirit, and also the contrast between works and fruit. Works are man made. We
produce things by what we do, and we call the result our works. In a
positive sense, we may speak of the works of Shakespeare, the works of Mozart,
the works of Rembrandt, and so on.
But fruit is grown. It is not produced only by human effort, but by its
nature and the nature of the soil. It grows by the power of life that is within
the seed, and that is planted in good ground. It is God Who makes things grow,
and therefore Paul uses the word fruit to speak of God's grace working in us.
However, although the growth of fruit is not a human work, it is aided by the
right kind of labor. Human labor consists of preparing the earth, tending to
the growing produce, and reaping it at the right time. But, it grows by another
kind of power, and human hands cannot make it. Now, we are given gifts
and helpful instruction to live by. We are given the gifts of Prayer,
Scripture, Sacraments and the godly fellowship of the Church. We are given,
therefore, means of grace to cultivate the fruit of the Spirit in our own
lives, and we must make use of them.
We must approach this based on what Jesus said:
“Abide
in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide
in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. I am the vine, ye are the
branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much
fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. (John 15:4,5)”
Jesus said those words the night before He went to His cross to die for our sins. He taught that, after he would rise from the dead, He would leave again to go to the Father (not by dying again, but by a mystery we call the Ascension), and that another Comforter (paraklētos) would come, that is, the Holy Spirit. And, although the Holy Spirit is another Comforter, that is, He is not the Son, still He is God and is One with the Father and the Son. When Jesus said "Without me ye can do nothing," and then spoke of His own Presence coming through "another (allos) Comforter." He made it clear, in saying these things, that He would be with us by the Holy Spirit. (That is because God is One. Where the Holy Spirit is Present in power to work in us, He brings the presence of the Father and of the Son.)
Jesus said those words the night before He went to His cross to die for our sins. He taught that, after he would rise from the dead, He would leave again to go to the Father (not by dying again, but by a mystery we call the Ascension), and that another Comforter (paraklētos) would come, that is, the Holy Spirit. And, although the Holy Spirit is another Comforter, that is, He is not the Son, still He is God and is One with the Father and the Son. When Jesus said "Without me ye can do nothing," and then spoke of His own Presence coming through "another (allos) Comforter." He made it clear, in saying these things, that He would be with us by the Holy Spirit. (That is because God is One. Where the Holy Spirit is Present in power to work in us, He brings the presence of the Father and of the Son.)
Look again at the fruit of the Spirit. It begins with love at the top of the
list ("love, joy, peace," etc.). That is the truly Divine love, using
the Greek word agapē.
This is what St. Paul describes in that famous chapter 13 of his First Epistle
to the Corinthians:
“Charity
suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself,
is not puffed up, Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not
easily provoked, thinketh no evil; Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in
the truth; Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things,
endureth all things. Charity never faileth (I Cor. 13:4-8).”
Where does that love come from? Paul, again, gave the answer:
"The love (agapē) of God is shed abroad in
our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us (Rom. 5:5).”
We need the grace and power of that Mysterious Presence among us. We need the
Holy Spirit to be active in us. And, we need to participate and find communion
in that life and power that He alone gives. Otherwise, we cannot bear the fruit
of the Spirit.
Today's Gospel reading teaches us what the key is.
“And
one of them, when he saw that he was healed, turned back, and with a loud voice
glorified God, and fell down on his face at his feet, giving him thanks: and he
was a Samaritan. And Jesus answering said, Were there not ten cleansed? but
where are the nine?”
The Samaritan who had been healed of leprosy returned to the Lord Jesus to give thanks. The key is in that expression of gratitude. If you know the full weight of what has been done for you by God's grace, by Christ pouring out his lifeblood for you on the cross, by His rising again to remain forever the Mediator between God and man, and by pouring out that other Comforter on his Church, you will return to give thanks. If you know what was done for you in your own baptism, the cleansing and rebirth in Christ, you will return to fall at His feet and give thanks.
The fruit of the Spirit cannot be made by our efforts, but we cultivate that fruit by cooperating actively with God. To walk in the Spirit is active, not passive. Each day we need to return to the Lord to give thanks. We give thanks by hearing His revealed word in the scared Scriptures, by prayer, by the sacraments and by the fellowship of the Church. We are given grace, and our participation, fellowship and communion (all of which are summed up in the original Greek New Testament by one word, koinōnia) must be active, not passive. We should not sit back, passively, and assume the fruit will grow without our cooperation; for then the weeds would strangle it. The flesh would be overcome by every passion, and we would be lost.
No, we cannot make the fruit by our own hands; it grows by the power of the life within it. But, we can prevent its growth by failing to cultivate it, by failing to return to the Lord Jesus Christ to give thanks. Without Him we can do nothing. With Him, abiding in Him, we can bring forth much fruit. Our lives can become the blessed, holy and joyful fellowship with God that lasts forever, that proclaims Jesus, and that makes Him known to every person we meet, whether or not we say a word.
The Samaritan who had been healed of leprosy returned to the Lord Jesus to give thanks. The key is in that expression of gratitude. If you know the full weight of what has been done for you by God's grace, by Christ pouring out his lifeblood for you on the cross, by His rising again to remain forever the Mediator between God and man, and by pouring out that other Comforter on his Church, you will return to give thanks. If you know what was done for you in your own baptism, the cleansing and rebirth in Christ, you will return to fall at His feet and give thanks.
The fruit of the Spirit cannot be made by our efforts, but we cultivate that fruit by cooperating actively with God. To walk in the Spirit is active, not passive. Each day we need to return to the Lord to give thanks. We give thanks by hearing His revealed word in the scared Scriptures, by prayer, by the sacraments and by the fellowship of the Church. We are given grace, and our participation, fellowship and communion (all of which are summed up in the original Greek New Testament by one word, koinōnia) must be active, not passive. We should not sit back, passively, and assume the fruit will grow without our cooperation; for then the weeds would strangle it. The flesh would be overcome by every passion, and we would be lost.
No, we cannot make the fruit by our own hands; it grows by the power of the life within it. But, we can prevent its growth by failing to cultivate it, by failing to return to the Lord Jesus Christ to give thanks. Without Him we can do nothing. With Him, abiding in Him, we can bring forth much fruit. Our lives can become the blessed, holy and joyful fellowship with God that lasts forever, that proclaims Jesus, and that makes Him known to every person we meet, whether or not we say a word.
Thursday, August 22, 2013
Thirteenth Sunday after Trinity
Galatians
3:16-22 * Luke 10:23-37
The
Epistle and Gospel for today help to bring balance to a subject that has been
confusing to Christians in the Western world for five centuries. Ever since the
days of Martin Luther the question of Faith and Works, and the role they may or
may not play in the salvation and justification of sinners, has dominated a
great deal of theological discourse. As you may know, Luther built his German
based Reformation on sola fide, which translates as “faith alone.” This
phrase, taken out of context and misunderstood, can take all of the statements by Saint Paul about faith, and make it the only
factor in the Christian life. And, indeed Saint
Paul does speak often about faith that justifies and
saves us. But, Saint Paul
never added the word “alone.” There is another kind of faith that is alone,
spoken of in the Bible: James 2: 17 says, “Even so faith, if it hath not works,
is dead, being alone.” Because of Saint James’ teaching in his Epistle, Martin
Luther called it “an Epistle of straw, compared
to” most of the New Testament. What is the balance? What is the truth about
faith and works, and the role of faith in our salvation?
In
fact, today’s Epistle is speaking more directly to the problem of faith and
works then either Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians, or the Epistle of James.
This is for two reasons. First of all, Paul never conceived of faith existing
all by itself, cut off from the rest of the Christian life. In the most famous
passage he ever wrote, the chapter about the love of God, the thirteenth
chapter of First Corinthians, he lists the three most important virtues
together: “And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest
of these is charity.” Faith never is alone. True faith that is planted in us by
the Holy Spirit always has two other virtues at its side: hope and charity. It
simply does not exist alone.
Article XI says, "that we are justified by faith only is a most wholesome doctrine, and very full of comfort." The careful use of "only" as opposed to "alone" is no accident. Article XII affirms that faith cannot exist alone, at least not for very long: "Albeit that good works, which are the fruits of faith and follow after justification, cannot put away our sins and endure the severity of God's judgment, yet are they pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ, and do spring out necessarily of a true and lively faith, insomuch that by them a lively faith may be as evidently known as a tree discerned by the fruit." True faith will produce fruit (and, in all fairness to Luther, he taught the same thing). Indeed the fruit will "spring out necessarily." The New Testament holds this as a consistent pattern: Faith produces love, and love produces good works.
Article XI says, "that we are justified by faith only is a most wholesome doctrine, and very full of comfort." The careful use of "only" as opposed to "alone" is no accident. Article XII affirms that faith cannot exist alone, at least not for very long: "Albeit that good works, which are the fruits of faith and follow after justification, cannot put away our sins and endure the severity of God's judgment, yet are they pleasing and acceptable to God in Christ, and do spring out necessarily of a true and lively faith, insomuch that by them a lively faith may be as evidently known as a tree discerned by the fruit." True faith will produce fruit (and, in all fairness to Luther, he taught the same thing). Indeed the fruit will "spring out necessarily." The New Testament holds this as a consistent pattern: Faith produces love, and love produces good works.
But,
in today’s Epistle, Paul tells us of the distinction between the Law and the
promise, specifically this promise that Abraham believed. And, Paul builds a
lot of teaching on this promise and the faith of Abraham, basing it on these
words from Genesis. “And He [God, that is] brought him [Abram] forth abroad,
and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number
them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be. And he believed in the LORD;
and he counted it to him for righteousness.”
The
Hebrew word for believed is the word “amen.” Amen (אמן) is a form of emet. Emet
(אמת) means “truth” and so “amen” means true. Jesus, when He
said “verily, verily” actually said, “Amen, amen, (ἀμήν
ἀμήν)
I say unto you.” When you say “amen” you are stating that you believe the words
spoken to be true. When Abram (as his name was at that stage) believed God,
what he believed, very specifically, was that God’s word is true. That is how
Abram amened God, and so was accounted righteous. From this Paul teaches
two things. First, believing in God’s revealed truth is essential to our being
accounted as righteous, namely, that by God’s mercy our sins are not taken into
account. He also taught that Abram, as yet uncircumcised, became the father not
only of the Jewish people, but of all people who have faith, that is all who
believe God’s word to be true, even Gentiles. All of this shows the absolute
necessity of faith. The writer to the Hebrews teaches us that this faith in
God’s promise was manifest when Abraham was ready to offer Isaac on the
mountain. James, however, uses the same story to teach the importance of works.
Again, this should not surprise us, because the issue never was faith versus
works.
We
are saved by grace through faith, not by our works. But, faith lives with hope
and charity. You can separate faith from works only if you can separate it from
charity. Your own good works cannot earn for you the forgiveness of your sins;
but the faith that calls and empowers you to enter the whole sacramental life
as a Christian is a faith that God’s word is true, and it is faith that lives
with hope and charity. And, because it lives with charity, good works will be
present in the life of faith. However, like the Samaritan in today’s Gospel,
this charity can be quite spontaneous. The Samaritan saw a man who may very
well have despised him were he not in dire straits. The Jews looked down on
Samaritans as being a group of Gentiles pretending to be Jews. They were seen
as being second class at best. This did not matter to the Samaritan in this
parable, and why? The answer is that he was, as the Lord said, “moved with
compassion.” He was not trying to balance out his sins with good works (which
is impossible). The idea of trying to appease God by doing a good work is not
indicated at all. Instead, the Samaritan simply has compassion, and acts
without resentment against a Jewish man who, under other circumstances, he may
have avoided. His charity is natural and spontaneous, not forced and contrived.
The
other thing we learn from the Epistle is the true context of faith and works as
a theological question. In the Western world, ever since the Reformation, the
whole treatment of this subject has been misunderstood, recast as a difference
between people within Christianity. But, this is not right. Paul was not
teaching that God’s grace saves us through just any faith, rather through faith
in something very specific -the faith that God’s word is true. The promise,
that we must say our own “amen” to, is the Gospel of Jesus Christ as it is now
revealed through the Word made flesh as proclaimed by his Apostles. Any effort
to be saved by works meant, as used by Paul in his Epistles, the effort to be
saved by the works, specifically, of the Law. The Law of commandments
that came four hundred and thirty years after Abram believed God’s promise,
does not make you righteous. It reveals that you are a sinner. It
reveals that you need the Savior from sin and death, the One who has died as
the Lamb of God that takes away the sin of the world, and rose again the third
day to destroy death. Before his conversion, when he was Saul of Tarsus, the
great persecutor of the Church believed himself to be righteous, and his zeal
to persecute the Church to have been the seal of his righteousness. But, when
he saw the Risen Christ, and was blinded as he drew close to Damascus , he learned that this great crowning
act of his own righteousness was actually the sin of persecuting the Messiah by
persecuting His Church. At once he learned of his sin, and of God’s mercy in
forgiving that sin. Saul of Tarsus (later St.
Paul the Apostle) was converted and began to see in his brief period of
physical blindness.
So,
the issue, at the time Saint Paul
was writing, was never some quality called faith versus good works.
These terms are used, rather, to speak of the difference between religion when
it is without a specific faith in Jesus Christ, even the best religion (the
truth of the Jewish religion based on the revelation of God to Patriarchs and
Prophets) and a belief that God’s word, the Gospel of Jesus Christ, is true. It
is the difference between trying to be saved by the Law of Commandments,
through efforts of self-deception that you are somehow a good person, and the
faith that embraces the entire new life of a Christian. I could say that it is
the difference between Judaism and Christianity; however, I would say that only
with respect. As Christians we do believe in Judaism, the Law and the Prophets.
It is simply that we also believe in the promise, and we say the “amen” of
faith that God’s word is true, specifically the word of the Gospel as preached
by the Apostles of the New Covenant, the word that is the foundation of the
Church in every age and place about Jesus Christ.
Then,
we must recall the words of James: “Even so faith, if it hath not works, is
dead, being alone. Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew
me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.”
That is, this faith will grow in us by the work of the Holy Spirit within our
hearts, and it will abide with hope and charity as we press on into the
sacramental life by the grace of God, pursuing the goal and end of our belief,
knowing God and His Son Jesus Christ whom He has sent (John 17:3).
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Twelfth Sunday after Trinity
II
Corinthians 3:4-9 * Mark 7:31-37
The Epistle reading we have heard today is the source for
a modern expression about the spirit and letter of the law. But, that, as
worthy as it is, does not even begin to touch upon St. Paul’s meaning. To
understand the Epistle reading we need to know the Old Testament reference to
which it refers:
“And
the LORD said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after the tenor of these
words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel. And he was there with
the LORD forty days and forty nights; he did neither eat bread, nor drink
water. And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten
commandments. And it came to pass, when Moses came down from mount Sinai with
the two tables of testimony in Moses' hand, when he came down from the mount,
that Moses wist not that the skin of his face shone while he talked with him.
And when Aaron and all the children of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of
his face shone; and they were afraid to come nigh him. And Moses called unto
them; and Aaron and all the rulers of the congregation returned unto him: and
Moses talked with them. And afterward all the children of Israel came nigh: and
he gave them in commandment all that the LORD had spoken with him in mount
Sinai. And till Moses had done speaking with them, he put a vail on his face.
But when Moses went in before the LORD to speak with him, he took the vail off,
until he came out. And he came out, and spake unto the children of Israel that
which he was commanded. And the children of Israel saw the face of Moses, that
the skin of Moses' face shone: and Moses put the vail upon his face again,
until he went in to speak with him (Exodus 34:27-35).”
We
need also to understand how we use the terms “Old Testament” and “New Testament”
in modern English. We use them to identify the two Testaments that, together,
are one Canon of Holy Scripture. But, there is another distinction to be made,
and sometimes it fails to come across in our translations. That distinction is
between the Old and New Covenants. When St. Paul said, “God… hath made us able
ministers of the New Testament,” the better translation, for our understanding,
should be “God… hath made us able ministers of the New Covenant.”
So the Prophet Jeremiah foretold the
New Covenant, and explained its difference and greater glory centuries before
St. Paul wrote his Second Epistle to the Church in Corinth:
“Behold,
the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house
of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I
made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them
out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an
husband unto them, saith the LORD: But this shall be the covenant that I will
make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my
law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God,
and they shall be my people. And they shall teach no more every man his
neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all
know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD; for
I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
(Jeremiah
31: 31-34).”
So, the Apostles understood the words
of the Lord Jesus, “This is my blood of the New Covenant, shed for you and for
many for the forgiveness of sins (Matthew 26:28).”
The essence of the Old Covenant Law is
called, by St. Paul, “the ministration of condemnation.” Is this a criticism of
God’s Law and commandments? The answer is no. The same Apostle tells us, “The
law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. (Romans 7:12).” It
was a covenant in which the glory of God was revealed. The ethical and moral
obligations of the human race were set forth, including the two Great
Commandments of the Law, to love God and neighbor. Jesus taught us, “Therefore
all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so
to them: for this is the law and the prophets (Matthew 7:12).” He said also,
“Think not that I am come
to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
(Matthew 5:17).”
And, yet, St. Paul tells us, “The
Letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.” The “Letter” is the Commandment of
the Law – “holy, just and good.” Here we see the consistency of St. Paul’s
message, and how it remains the same from Epistle to Epistle. His message was
the grace of God through faith in Jesus Christ. Whether you study Romans,
Ephesians, Galatians, the Epistle we heard from today, etc., always,
everywhere, the Apostle teaches us, “The law was our schoolmaster to
bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith (Galatians 3:24).”
The Law is weak, not because it is insufficient as the revelation of God’s holy
requirements, but weak through the weakness of our flesh, our fallen mortal
nature.
“For
what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God
sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin
in the flesh (Romans 8:3).”
He condemned sin in the flesh, for
“The Logos was made flesh and dwelt among us (John 1:14),” and in the
flesh He carried your sin and mine, indeed all the sin of the whole world, and
nailed it to His cross. So, for all who repent and believe, it is sin that is
condemned and dead, but we who are alive in the Risen Lord Jesus Christ.
We have heard people ask why it is
that everyone is not healed always and everywhere of every sickness? I have a
better question. Look at the Gospel reading today, and ask why Jesus healed the
deaf and dumb man. The real question, in light of the “holy, just and good”
commandments of the Law, is “Why did Jesus ever heal anybody?” Why did He go
about “doing good, and healing all who were oppressed by the devil (Acts 10:38
)?”
According
to the Letter of the Law, if that alone was God’s whole revelation, He should
have come in fiery wrath and blotted everyone out. But that is not the whole of
God’s revelation. He has revealed His mercy and grace. God came into this world
in His Son, and redeemed us from sin and death. The greater glory of the New
Covenant is the grace of God in Christ. It is revealed in the Incarnation, it
is revealed in His works of mercy and healing, it is revealed on the cross
where He died for the sins of the whole world, and it is revealed in His
resurrection when He defeated death.
Moses hid the glory of his
ministration of the Old Covenant by wearing the veil. Even so, everyone could
see the light somewhat through that veil, enough to know it was there. But, the
glory of God shines forever in the face of His Son, Jesus Christ. It is the
greater glory of the New Covenant, of the Gospel, of the Spirit that gives
Life.
Saturday, August 10, 2013
Eleventh Sunday after Trinity
1
Cor. 15: 1-11 * Luke 18:9-14
It
is very fitting that St. Paul
is the Apostle who wrote the Epistle from which we have heard this day, because
of what we read this same day from the Gospel of Luke. St. Paul was, in his lifetime, both of the
men in this parable. He was both the Pharisee who believed his own
self-righteous delusion, and then, by God's grace, he became as the Publican
who repented, confessed his sin, and was justified. Paul was, in his youth,
just like the Pharisee about whom we read, thinking himself righteous and
despising others. But, when coming close to Damascus in order to persecute those who were
Jesus' disciples and believers, he saw the Risen Lord Jesus Christ, and at once
came to see himself, Saul the Pharisee, as not only a sinner, but the chief of
sinners. Instead of self-confidence before God, he acquired humility; instead
of boasting he learned to confess. He confesses his sin with all humility in
this very same Epistle text, as we heard:
For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an
apostle, because I persecuted the church
of God .
I have no patience with many modern commenters
who belittle Paul as if he continued to have the Pharisaical attitude all his
life long, and who are deluded and arrogant enough to suppose that they see it
in his Epistles. Any excuse will do, not to learn from the Apostle, any excuse
to treat him as less than the holy martyr that he is, to speak of him as less
than Jesus Christ's appointed messenger to bring the Gospel to the nations,
Apostle to the Gentiles and writer of most of the New Testament. We have the
witness of St. Peter that the Epistles of Paul were so revered that, even in
his lifetime, the Church began regarding them as γραφo (i.e.
Scriptures. See II Pet. 3:15,16).
Paul was joyful and grateful, even through all of his suffering and the
persecution he endured for the rest of his earthly life. He had been set free
from the worst kind of self-deception and delusion. He came to see that no man can
make himself righteous, and that only by God's grace can we be forgiven and
justified, and that only by the grace of God active in one's life, by the Holy
Spirit who is given to us, can we become holy. The true heart of St. Paul comes
across more clearly than ever a couple of chapters later, when writing about
charity, the perfect and perfecting love of God for us, and within us by the
Holy Spirit.
Comparing his old unconverted life to the new creation in Christ that he had
become (II Cor. 5:17), the Apostle wrote us this autobiographical sketch:
“Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust
in the flesh, I more: Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of
the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a
Pharisee; Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness
which is in the law, blameless. But what things were gain to me, those I
counted loss for Christ. Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the
excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered
the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, And
be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but
that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by
faith.”- Phil. 3: 5-9
When the Lord appeared to Saul, and made him an eyewitness of the resurrection,
many things changed in his understanding. His righteous act of persecuting the Church was revealed to have been the sin of
persecuting the Messiah Himself, his own self-attained righteousness was shown
to be a delusion, and the curse that was evident in the manner of Jesus’ death
was revealed to be atonement paid by the Righteous One for the many, the
sinners, thus taking away the curse from those who deserved it (Gal. 3:13).
Right away, at his conversion, Paul was granted the revelation that would
become his bold teaching about faith in Jesus Christ and the grace that he gives,
that Jesus Christ is Himself our only Salvation.
Understand what Paul always means when he speaks of our salvation by grace
through faith (and remember that phrase exactly, by grace through faith).
He never speaks of "faith" simply as an attribute or attitude. He
means faith in a very specific way: that is, specifically, faith in Jesus
Christ. If we discuss faith and works, let us be clear: Faith means this faith in
Jesus. Furthermore, as he would warn these same Corinthian Christians in a
later Epistle (II Cor. 11:1f), there are other gospels and there is another
Jesus, indeed, gospels and christs as
varied as the human imagination with demonic influence may create.
And, it matters because in this text from Paul's First Epistle to the
Corinthians, we see the details listed for us so that we may know what to
present if we are to preach the Gospel (εὐαγγέλιον, Euaggelion). The true Gospel of the
real Lord Jesus Christ is never complete, and is never really preached, without
these four facts that are brought out in today's Epistle. As there are four
books we call Gospels, there is one message of the Gospel that has four facts,
the facts we have already heard this day. Someone in the blogosphere wanted to argue with me
that there is only one Gospel, because I referred in passing to the four
Gospels. In a sense he was right: There is only one message we call the Gospel.
The four books we call the Gospels all preach this message, for in each of the
four Gospel books we have these four facts, which are the Gospel. In sermons of
either St. Peter or St. Paul ,
in the Book of Acts, you will find these four same four facts.
1. Christ died for our sins as the scriptures foretold.
2. He was buried.
3. He rose the third day as the scriptures foretold.
4. He appeared to witnesses.
We need to get this right, for our own salvation and for the purpose of
communicating the message. Paul wrote of the supernatural power of the
Holy Spirit that is present by proclaiming this simple message. He wrote,
"I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto
salvation to every one that believeth."
(Rom.1:16) The word translated "power" is a special word that is used
for the work of the Holy Spirit, a word that always means miraculous power. The
word is δύναμις (dunamis), from which we get words like dynamic, and even
dynamite. So, Paul was saying that the
Gospel is the miraculous and supernatural
power of God unto salvation to everyone who believes; that the Holy Spirit
is the One who gives the message this power to work the miracle of salvation in
each believer (if you will receive it, this makes true evangelism genuinely
sacramental). God places within this message the same power that has healed the
blind, and that raises the dead.
So, let us be diligent to get it right.
First of all, we must be clear who we mean when we say Christ. We do not
mean simply a good man or great religious leader. We do not mean simply a
prophet. We do not mean simply a man who died for a cause, or who was unjustly
condemned. We mean, as Paul calls him later in this same chapter, "the
Lord from heaven." (v.47) We mean the One who is Himself with God, and is
God, and is also with God in the unity of the Trinity, the Word made flesh
(John 1:14). We mean the one who was born of a virgin, as St. Matthew and St.
Luke teach clearly in their Gospels. So, this Person we call Jesus Christ is
exactly who we have professed him to be in saying the Creed:
"God of God, Light of Light, Very God of very God, Begotten, not made,
Being of one substance with the Father, By whom all things were made: Who for
us men, and for our salvation came down from heaven, And was incarnate by the
Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary, And was made man, And was crucified also for us
under Pontius Pilate. He suffered and was
buried, And the third day he rose again according to the Scriptures, And
ascended into heaven, And sitteth on the
right hand of the Father. And he shall come again with glory to judge both the
quick and the dead: Whose kingdom shall have no end."
John warns that any spirit that will not confess that Jesus Christ is come in
the flesh is that spirit of Antichrist, also called the spirit of error (I John
4:1f) That is, it refuses to confess the Incarnation, either by denying that he
is God, One with the Father and the Holy Spirit, or by denying that he has
taken complete human nature into his uncreated and Divine Person.
So, again, Paul writes:
Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the
form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of
no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the
likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and
became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. Wherefore God also
hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: That
at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in
earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that
Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Phil. 2:5-11)
1. Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures.
Here, as in the Creed, the phrase “according to the scriptures” means “in
fulfillment of the scriptures.” Look at the 22nd
Psalm. Look at the Suffering Servant passage from the 53rd chapter of Isaiah
(if you do not know this entire passage, then read it and learn it at home:
Isaiah 52:13-53:12):
“But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our
iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we
are healed. All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his
own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all”
Drawing from the Epistle to the Hebrews, our service of Holy Communion puts it this way:
"All glory be to thee, Almighty God, our heavenly Father, for that
thou, of thy tender mercy, didst give thine only Son Jesus Christ to suffer
death upon the Cross for our redemption; who made there (by his one oblation of
himself once offered) a full, perfect, and sufficient sacrifice, oblation, and
satisfaction, for the sins of the whole world."
2. He was buried.
That is, He died, really and truly in fact, He was dead. The one Man who ever
lived and did not deserve the wages of sin, death, (Rom. 6:23) was dead and
buried just like everyone else.
3. He rose the third day according to (again, in fulfillment of) the
scriptures.
Throughout the book of Acts the most commonly used passage of the Old Testament
for this is in the 16th Psalm:
“Therefore my heart is glad, and my glory rejoiceth:
my flesh also shall rest in hope. For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell;
neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.”
This is a real and material fact, that He rose in His body of flesh and bone,
transforming it into a body that cannot die.
4. He appeared to witnesses.
This fourth fact is essential to the Gospel. Without these eyewitnesses, the
resurrection of Christ would be a mere story. But, the resurrection of Christ
is a fact of history, recorded with the blood of martyrs, men who saw Him alive
again after His resurrection. While Saint
Paul was writing this Epistle, many of these witnesses
were yet alive, giving the Church that assurance and confidence that it needed
to survive the earliest days of persecution. The Greek word translated
"witness" throughout the New Testament is μάρτυς
(martus). It became our English word martyr. Originally, it meant a
witness, one who testifies. Eventually, this witness or martyrdom,
testimony of seeing the risen Christ, cost the eyewitnesses their lives in this
world; but having seen the resurrected Christ, they despised death; they feared
the grave no longer.
Months from now, in the winter on January 25th,
we will celebrate the Conversion of Saint Paul. On that day, we clergy wear
white, and the altar is decorated with white. If the feast is about Saint Paul , then surely
we ought to wear red, should we not? Red is the color of martyrs. But, the
Feast of the Conversion of Saint Paul is not about Paul; it is about the last
Easter appearance, a part of Easter “out of due time,” just as Saint Paul was called by seeing the Risen
Christ “as one born out of due time.” His conversion came from being the last
witness of the resurrection of Christ, at which point he learned all of these
things we meditate upon today. He learned that he was a sinner. He learned that
he was forgiven. He learned that this forgiveness was given by the sacrifice of
Christ on his behalf.
1. Christ died for our sins as the scriptures foretold.
2. He was buried.
3. He rose the third day as the scriptures foretold.
4. He appeared to witnesses.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.jpg)
