tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18902745.post114635190824370435..comments2024-03-24T15:19:06.377-04:00Comments on The Continuum: DEVIANTS AND FORMULARIESFr. Robert Harthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05892141425033196616noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18902745.post-1146365555111321602006-04-29T22:52:00.000-04:002006-04-29T22:52:00.000-04:00Post a Comment On: The Continuum "DEVIANTS AND FOR...Post a Comment On: The Continuum "DEVIANTS AND FORMULARIES" <BR/>1 Comment -Show Original Post <BR/><BR/>poetreader said... <BR/>Good points. If one is to judge a church by its deviant theologians, there's not a church that would pass. I've read some old RC documents, bearing the imprimatur, no less, which say horrific things about the Eucharistic Sacrifice that, in my opinion would invalidate the whole thing by the degree to which it distorted intent -- <B>of it were to be the official teaching of the church.</B> Since it isn't, it becomes merely a curiosity of bad teaching, very much indeed like the teaching of some of the aberrant Protestant Anglicans. Indeed, there a lot of things being taught in some places in the Middle Ages which, had they been officisal teaching, would have justified the wholesale condemnations thundered by the radical Reformers. Since those teachings were never the teachings of the church, neither is the condemnation justified.poetreaderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11613032927883843078noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18902745.post-1146365421528682162006-04-29T22:50:00.000-04:002006-04-29T22:50:00.000-04:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.poetreaderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11613032927883843078noreply@blogger.com