This essay comes with a text, I Corinthians 11:17-34 (for
clarity I will use the RSV).
“But
in the following instructions I do not commend you, because when you come
together it is not for the better but for the worse. For, in the first place,
when you assemble as a church, I hear that there are divisions among you; and I
partly believe it, for there must be factions among you in order that those
who are genuine among you may be recognized. When you meet together, it is not the
Lord's supper that you eat. For in eating, each one goes ahead with his own meal, and
one is hungry and another is drunk. What! Do you not have houses to eat and drink in? Or do
you despise the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What shall
I say to you? Shall I commend you in this? No, I will not. For I received from the Lord what I also delivered
to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and
when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, "This is my body which is
for you. Do this in remembrance of me." In
the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, "This cup is the new
covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of
me." For as often as you eat
this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes. Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord
in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the
Lord.] Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of
the cup. For any one who eats and
drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why many of you are weak and
ill, and some have died. But if
we judged ourselves truly, we should not be judged. But when we are judged by the Lord, we
are chastened so that we may not be condemned along with the world.
So
then, my brethren, when you come together to eat, wait for one another --if any one is hungry, let him eat at
home -- lest you come together to be condemned. About the other things I will
give directions when I come.”
Earlier
this week I pointed out that our Book of Common Prayer tradition does not
require intellectual assent to a specific theory about how Christ is present in
the Sacrament, but instead lays out specific requirements in the Invitation to
the General Confession. The General Absolution, spoken only by a priest, lays
out conditions, most notably “hearty (sincere) repentance and true faith.”
Among the requirements in the Invitation we see that the communicant must be
“in love and charity” with his neighbors (Matthew 5:23, 24).
As I
look out at the general mindset of our own people, I wonder if we have the
right priorities about how we are to receive this sacrament. I even fear that
some novice priest somewhere is adding conditions from his own mistaken notion
about the “teaching of the Church” from an imagined Canon of something he calls
the Tradition. Perhaps he embraces a theory, like Roman Transubstantiation, or
Lutheran Consubstantiation, or something less defined except in his own
understanding. Perhaps he thinks that he should not communicate any person who
fails to share his own understanding of the Sacrament.
I
would challenge such a novice priest (perhaps such a perpetually novice priest)
to show me in Scripture a clear definition of his theory set forth as
revelation, or to demonstrate that any of the Ecumenical Councils ever laid
down any definition. Sacraments are Mysteries (from the word Mysterion),
and no one actually knows how the bread and wine become the Body and
Blood of Christ. Whatever devotions you direct to the Sacrament, remember that
it is a mystery beyond your comprehension. But, never forget that it is no
“bare sign,” and therefore is not effectual, in terms of grace, until you eat
and drink it with faith (John 6:54).
Nonetheless, I
must challenge the whole idea that St. Paul’s concern in the above text is
about any theory of Real Presence.
It is obvious that St. Paul regards the elements to be both bread and wine, and
Christ’s Body and Blood at the same time. But, when he speaks of discerning the
Lord’s Body, or rather of failure to do so, look at the context. The context is
more about being “in love and charity” with your neighbors than it is about
your theological understanding of the Sacrament. A person may have the best
humanly possible understanding of the Sacrament, but fail to discern the Lord’s
Body by harboring resentment or by mistreating members of the Body of Christ. Another may have no proper understanding of Christ’s Real Presence in the
Sacrament, may even confuse it with a “bare sign” through honest ignorance, and
yet receive it with “hearty repentance and true faith” walking in love and
charity. It is that ignorant man who better discerns the Lord’s Body than the
other.
Look
at the context. What immediately follows this text about unworthy reception of
the Lord’s Body and Blood? What immediately follows it is the twelfth chapter,
about the Church as the Body of Christ, and gifts of the Spirit in the various
members of Christ’s Body. And, the context of that must include the famous
chapter thirteen that follows. The great chapter on Charity (the love of God)
was a stinging prophetic style rebuke to selfish Corinthian Christians, however
much we may try to make sweet, sweet music of its words.
I do
not fear that our people are receiving the Sacrament without some appreciation
for Christ’s Real Presence at the altar. I do fear that some of our people do,
even with that appreciation, fail to discern the Lord’s Body. If you cannot
love Christ in your brothers and sisters, if you do not see Him in His Body the
Church, it doesn’t matter at all if you appreciate His presence in the
Sacramental elements.
Why
did St. Paul begin by reminding them of the Lord’s betrayal? We even use those
words in our service straight from this very text: “The night in which He was betrayed…”
What is it, but betrayal of Christ Himself, to mistreat the members of His Body
the Church? Be it by selfishness, by gossip, by sinful and willful alienation,
the lack of charity makes one unworthy to receive. Such a person may have the
soundest and best understanding, but it profits him nothing. He is not in love
and charity with his neighbors, and therefore not ready to receive the
Sacrament he may so deeply understand – he may even understand all mysteries;
it profits him nothing.